Elastic Email is an email delivery service for transactional emailing.
$29
per month for up to 2,500 contacts and 37,500 emails
Leadfwd
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Leadfwd, from the company of the same name in Staten Island, combines B2B Prospecting, Sales Outreach and Account-Based Marketing. It replaces the former INBOX25.
N/A
Pricing
Elastic Email
Leadfwd
Editions & Modules
Inbox Plus
$9
per month per user
Email API Starter
$19
per month for up to 50,000 emails
Email Marketing Starter
$29
per month for up to 2,500 contacts and 37,500 emails
Email API Pro
$49
per month for up to 50,000 emails
Email Marketing Pro
$49
per month for up to 2,500 contacts and 37,500 emails
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Elastic Email
Leadfwd
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Elastic Email
Leadfwd
Features
Elastic Email
Leadfwd
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Elastic Email
-
Ratings
Leadfwd
7.4
2 Ratings
3% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
3.22 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
6.22 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
8.62 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
8.82 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Elastic Email
-
Ratings
Leadfwd
8.0
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Elastic Email
-
Ratings
Leadfwd
7.0
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Elastic Email
-
Ratings
Leadfwd
7.5
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Elastic Email
-
Ratings
Leadfwd
6.3
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Email Elastic is best suited in cases when we need to send bulk emails and campaigns. It provides features such as scheduling campaigns and automating fast delivery of emails; the trial version also provides many features that can be used by a new user. Email Elastic is less suited for small companies with a smaller number of clients or contacts.
I think Inbox25 is a great fit for companies outgrowing lower-end, disconnected email marketing applications. Companies with a more formalized marketing organization that send a lot of emails (tens of thousands monthly or more) will be better served with a product like Inbox25 that is less complex, easier to use, and much more affordable (30% lower by our experience) from the larger marketing automation products on the market. Our company has 3 full-time marketing staff with over 100,000 contacts (with valid emails) that we target in various direct and drip email campaigns and Inbox25 fits our needs just fine. I suspect that we may outgrow the product eventually but I think it'll meet our needs just fine for many years to come.
I wish they didn't have such a strict requirement regarding their "opt out" links in emails. I totally understand why they do this, but there are use cases, such as one to one personal emails between individuals, where this is annoying. However, it's something I'm willing to live with for the greater good.
Inbox25 is in a growth phase and has transformed their product pretty fast. With that comes an increased need to continually learn how to leverage new features.
Tutorials and product documentation exist but it is relatively minimal. They overcome this with personalized, one-on-one training that is recorded for future review using a project management platform.
Inbox25 has expanded beyond Sugar CRM to include Salesforce.com integration. I'm not sure if they plan to add integrations to other applications but they are positioned well for growth.
I have not had any issues with Elastic Email that have required reaching out to support, so I can't speak to the quality of their customer support. The help documents were well written and presented, though, and I would imagine that anyone with issues would receive satisfactory assistance in a timely manner.
Email elastic is a cost-effective, fast, and reliable platform for sending bulk emails and promoting campaigns, it provides good features even for the new user, while Blaze Verify pricing is a bit high, and a new user would not be able to access all the features. Hence clearly, Elastic email leads the position when compared to Blaze Verify.
We have successfully moved cold suspects to leads and leads to opportunities, and opportunities to customers with Inbox25. We are just now starting to realize more value given that we've only recently started using the more advanced drip marketing and lead scoring features.
When we used the pay-as-you-go version we were paying just pennies per email and remained CAN-Spam Act compliant. It was harder to quantify the ROI then but it was apparent that email marketing was working and moving prospects from one sales stage to another. It was also very useful for re-engaging prospects and promoting products and services to customers.
Our total investment in the advanced edition is less $30,000 annually and we expect the ROI to be less than one year. It could have been sooner if we'd have been more thoughtful in our initial implementation.