Elastic Enterprise Search vs. IBM Watson Content Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Elastic Enterprise Search
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Elastic Enterprise Search Swiftype is a platform with modules for Site Search, App Search and Workplace Search, that boasts powering search for thousands of enterprises and websites. The services were developed by Swiftype and acquired by Elastic in late 2017. Powered by Elasticsearch, the vendor states Elastic Enterprise Search is fast, with proven, optimized relevance models designed for real-life, natural search.
$79
per month
IBM Watson Content Analytics
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Content Analytics is an enterprise search option. This supersedes IBM's older offerings, IBM Omnifind and IBM Content Analytics and Enterprise Search.N/A
Pricing
Elastic Enterprise SearchIBM Watson Content Analytics
Editions & Modules
Standard
$79
per month
Pro
$199
per month
Premium
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Elastic Enterprise SearchIBM Watson Content Analytics
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Elastic Enterprise SearchIBM Watson Content Analytics
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Elastic Enterprise SearchIBM Watson Content Analytics
Small Businesses
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Elastic Enterprise SearchIBM Watson Content Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Elastic Enterprise SearchIBM Watson Content Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Elastic
Swiftype is excellent for e-commerce companies and especially the financial services sector where speed plays a major role in executing transactions. It is also very dynamic and customizable. It is very useful for electronics/travel reservations on e-commerce sites also. The only place it is inappropriate is when it comes to indexing a website in which case Google is slightly better, as I mentioned before. There is nothing much to complain about here in regards to the breadth of applications and analytics it offers.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Content Analytics is well suited for organizations with the resources to invest a significant amount of energy in an advanced analytics engine. The software improved the productivity of analysts and programmers. The software is not suitable for companies that just want Excel-type analyses or that lack the capabilities of doing advanced analytics.
Read full review
Pros
Elastic
  • It's very easy to implement. The documentation is great and you can be up and running very quickly.
  • It's easy to configure. The web-based user interface makes it super simple to configure (i.e. customize search rankings, edit synonyms, etc.).
  • Their support is very friendly and helpful. Whenever I had a question or couldn't figure something old, they were quick to help me out.
Read full review
IBM
  • Impressive and efficient indexing system.
  • Rarely does the indexing have issues that need to rebuild/reindex.
  • Searches are almost instantaneous and end users can move on to the next task.
Read full review
Cons
Elastic
  • Swiftype does not have indexes ready to go. When you add a new website to the search set, it takes some time to index the website. This is something that is different from what Google does. Google in this particular aspect does a relatively better job.
  • Swiftype is very expensive, this makes it difficult for smaller companies to afford.
Read full review
IBM
  • It would be better if its available for cross platforms.
  • Pricing could be adjusted better.
  • More number of third party add-ons required.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Elastic
Google Search Appliance is no longer supported. Apache Solr is a popular, free open source solution, but it lacks a web crawler and is more difficult to configure and maintain.
Read full review
IBM
Perhaps the biggest advantage of IBM Watson Content Analytics is the IBM feel. I think IBM puts lots of resources into developing products that even sociologists can use. It's so easy, that to professionals wanting customized analysis, it might be kind of offensive. The drawback is that Content Analytics is not as fast as its competitors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Elastic
  • It has a positive impact as it helps traders and other users to seamlessly use applications.
  • It has a positive ROI and we would know the results in time to come.
Read full review
IBM
  • Organized, easy to produce search results.
  • Never lose a document again.
Read full review
ScreenShots