Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor CMS
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor CMS
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Epicor CMS
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
10.01 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
10.02 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.02 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Single sign-on capability
10.02 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.02 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
9% above category average
Dashboards
10.01 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Standard reports
9.02 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Custom reports
9.02 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.5
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
10.02 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Accounts receivable
10.02 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.02 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.02 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
10.02 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Standardized Processes
10.02 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.02 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.02 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Location management
10.02 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.4
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing
10.02 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Credit card processing
10.01 Ratings
3.09 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.02 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
10.02 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.02 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.02 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Period Close
10.02 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.4
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
5.01 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Project Costing
7.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
5.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.01 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
34% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.01 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
10.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
10.01 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
10.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
10.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Contract Authoring
10.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
10.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
10.02 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Supplier Management
10.02 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.3
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Control Management
7.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
7.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
9.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.01 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.01 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.01 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Production Process Design
10.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Production Management
8.02 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.02 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Work Execution
8.02 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
31% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
22% above category average
Forecasting
10.02 Ratings
9.95 Ratings
Inventory Planning
10.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
10.02 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.1
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.0
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Proposal Management
8.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Epicor CMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Through daily use of Epicor, it is apparent that at it's basest level, it favors a stock-based manufacturing model (your company has established SKUs and Production works to replenish stock levels when a KANBAN or other system triggers a re-order point). While it excels at that, ours is a custom-order industrial manufacturing model (we produce to customer specification or repeat orders), meaning there is no stocking of finished components, only the materials it takes to make them. It's taken some finesse (and the purchase of additional modules) to get to where we need to be.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
Epicor CMS had a UI that was deemed more aesthetically pleasing than (subjective, naturally!) Sage, for which we attended a presentation/orientation session. Our Team felt Epicor (once outfitted with the necessary add-ons) would be better suited in the long run for longevity and ongoing support (especially considering our outgoing software was Sage).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Epicor has necessitated dedicated "Staging" personnel, as multi-line orders are generated as individual orders to Production/Manufacturing, meaning someone must ensure they all come together upon completion prior to shipping.
Payroll and Accounts Payable/Receivable have noted improved integration and tracking compared to the legacy/outgoing software (Business Vision).
Inventory tracking is vastly improved over the outgoing software, with detailed reports/tracking of remnant/off-cut materials, which benefits Material Handlers as well as the Purchasing Manager for keeping the inventory budget in line with targets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info