Evalato vs. Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Evalato
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Evalato helps users streamline their awards programs and grow their success. It’s a cloud-based solution for award managers, program managers and any professional who organizes awards, competitions, nominations, prizes, powerlists, and other programs. Evalato is designed to help awards organizers: Collect and manage applications Empower evaluation with options and maximum flexibility Amplify impact and…
$2,906
per year
Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
With Foundant GLM, users can create, launch and receive online applications and grant reports, manage online proposal reviews, and manage grants and information from a single, integrated solution from anywhere they have internet access.N/A
Pricing
EvalatoFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Editions & Modules
GROW
$2,906
per year
PREMIUM
$5,276
per year
PRO
$6,393
per year
Enterprise
GET A QUOTE
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EvalatoFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsUnlimited free testing. No setup or training fees.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EvalatoFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Considered Both Products
Evalato
Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
I selected GLM for the intuitive nature of the system and its ability to communicate with the other software platforms we utilize.
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
The decision to choose Grant Lifecycle Manager was made before I began in this position, but we have renewed our license because we were so happy with the service.
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
GLM had the right combination of structure, utility, customer-focus, price that made it the most appealing.
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
I used GIFTS more than 10 years ago. Their development was glacial, and it was clumsy software. They took much longer to develop the on-line application process. I also reviewed Philan Tech. They did not offer the same flexibility that Foundant's GLM did. Nor did the …
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
We used MicroEdge GIFTS (server hosted, not online) for about five years, but became frustrated with the fact that their improvements were not provided to existing users of the product unless they purchased additional modules, usually at $20K+ each, even though we had to pay …
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
I have not used other online grantmaking products or evaluated others. I used to use MicroEdge Gifts, but not the online application version. It was a stand alone management system. This is hands-down better, easier to use and a more complete system.
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
We selected GLM 7 years ago and have not regretted that decision. It's extremely reasonably priced and their customer service is outstanding.
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
We are former GIFTS clients. GIFTS was good but expensive for our small organization and had declining customer service. The GIFTS product we owned had several add on modules which added to the cost and made the product disjointed. Foundant's Grant Lifecycle Management was more …
Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
In 2011 we demoed and reviewd IGAM, Good Done Great, Grant Lifecycle Manager (Foundant) and ChesterCap. Each company and software had strength and weaknesses. We selected Grant Lifecycle Manager based on the product's cost (and how the subscription cost is based); the …
Best Alternatives
EvalatoFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Small Businesses
Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Workday Financial Management
Workday Financial Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EvalatoFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EvalatoFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Evalato is a great award management software, which has all of the necessary tools. One of the best features we used is that it allowed us to create our own award competition form and embed it into our website. This was a real lifesaver, as we didn't need to hire web developers to help us with that part of the process. It was all handled through Evalato's platform and it saved us time and money.
Read full review
This product is great and well-suited for smaller organizations who are interested in doing an online grantmaking system for the first time or upgrading from a simple survey-type application. You would love this product for basic applications and reports; [...] [its also great] if you want to do some light reporting. This is not a product that is robust enough to handle complex budgets, contact or email management, or complex outcomes metrics. It also will not work if you are trying to track your conversations with potential grantees before they apply.
Read full review
Pros
  • Structures the categories in the awards conveniently
  • Organize judging of awards
  • Automates processes that are important for quality awards
Read full review
  • Customer Service: Foundant is always super helpful and speedy in their responses to my questions, whether it's an email or call.
  • Connections to other users: There's a great online community that's willing to share what works for their organizations.
  • Company Response/Development: Foundant is continually updating (where it needs to) to make their product the best it can be, and is willing (and does) take comments and suggestions from clients for how the software could be improved.
  • Training: A variety of training options- ranging from in person conferences to web-based tutorials. Very helpful, and updated as the product is.
Read full review
Cons
  • I have not needed improvement. Works great for me
Read full review
  • I don't think about what's lacking. This is much better than our previous grants management software.
  • The landing page could have a snappier design.
  • I wish our grantees could see more than one follow-up for a process at a time. Sometimes there needs to be a project mod submitted while that is an active renewal going on.
Read full review
Usability
Evalato’s features have made it easier for us to organize our programs and collect applications, the software has also saved us time and has increased our programs’ impact
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
In my work experience I have only used Evalato for Award Management
Read full review
I used GIFTS more than 10 years ago. Their development was glacial, and it was clumsy software. They took much longer to develop the on-line application process.
I also reviewed Philan Tech. They did not offer the same flexibility that Foundant's GLM did. Nor did the company have the depth of software engineering experience that Philan Tech had at the time.
Finally, I used a back-office support company for a short time that has an on-line grant management component. This option proved to be too cumbersome and too expensive. And I did not personally get along with the staff there. Definitely not a good fit for the Replogle Foundation and me.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Great ROI as we were able to increase the number of entries through Evalato, therefore we earned more.
  • We achieved our marketing goals.
  • We got great feedback for the ease of use from the judges and participants of our awards.
Read full review
  • This software has made it much easier to work with reviewers (panels of community volunteers who provide scores and comments for the grant applications). While we only use the Evaluator function for two of our many grant programs, the merge templates have saved a lot of time in assembling the materials to send digitally (one PDF per application) for the other grant programs. In our old database, I had to download each document from the application, convert to PDF, then combine. That was very labor intensive! In this software, I create a merge template and all the documents that I want included are automatically converted to PDF, in the order I want them. This was a big reason we moved to this software and it continues to be a fantastic feature.
  • The automatic email reminders that have been built into the software (this is one example of an excellent improvement that has been added since we got the software - showing their constant efforts to get even better) have saved a lot of time and effort. I used to set reminders on my calendar every year to write a long involved email to all the grantees for a particular grant program, to remind them to submit their grant reports. And then, if they still forgot, I had to chase them down. Now, I just set up the reports in the software and there is an automatic reminder that goes out two weeks before; if they still forget, there is an automatic reminder that goes out one day after the deadline to let them know that it's late. I still have to chase a few of them down but the majority are taken care of.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Evalato Screenshots

Screenshot of Evalato - analyticsScreenshot of Evalato - dashboardScreenshot of Evalato - award list