TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FigJam

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AFigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.

    $5

    per month per editor

    XWiki

    Score8.2 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    XWiki is an open-source collaborative platform designed to enhance business collaboration and streamline knowledge management for companies of all sizes. As a an alternative to proprietary knowledge bases, XWiki offers a structured second-generation wiki with over 900 pre-made extensions, enabling businesses to add features and customize their XWiki instance to meet specific needs. Key features and benefits: Structured wiki concept: XWiki organizes knowledge…

    $300

    per year 10 users

    Pricing
    FigJamXWiki
    Editions & Modules
    FigJam Professional
    $36
    per year per editor
    FigJam Organization
    $60
    per year per editor
    Starter
    €300
    per year for up to 10 users
    On-Premise
    Custom Pricing
    (Pro Plans available for On-Premise deployment)
    Basic
    starting at €1443
    per year for up to 25 users
    Business
    starting at €10890
    per year for up to 250 users
    Enterprise
    starting at €33000
    per year for up to 500 users
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigJamXWiki
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Discount available for multi-year pricing and higher user volumes. Up to a 50% discount available for NGOs and institutions of higher learning.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigJamXWiki
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    No answer on this topic
    XWiki SAS
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    67%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    FigJamXWiki
    Small Businesses
    Whimsical
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Slite
    Score5.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Whimsical
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Bloomfire
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Whimsical
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Bloomfire
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigJamXWiki
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigJamXWiki
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    If you're working in small product teams, like triads, and already using Figma, this is a no brainer for white boarding, quick/fast sketches, wireframing, collaborative doodling ... it gets less appropriate with large teams, infrequent. IMO, due to the way in which they price, it's better to keep the inner circle small-ish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    XWiki SAS
    XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
    • Easy to preview
    • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    XWiki SAS
    • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
    • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
    • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It misses easy-to-use pre sets of diagrams. The ones presented seem to be not native and hard to use. Miro is a good benchmark.
    • Navegating throught projects in the main page is confusing, specially when people are not admin users.
    • It should suggest ways of organizing the pages designers do, specially when the project is big and have many pages and sections.
    • It could have, for example, a draft version for every page, so that one can hide it when they finish the work, but can open it whenever something needs to be modified, versioning the job.
    Read full review
    XWiki SAS
    • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    XWiki SAS
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the experience much more engaging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    XWiki SAS
    XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
    • Fast app development framework with very rich API
    • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • FigJam saves a lot of time ... it's nice to have all my visual notes/sketches within Figma itself where a lot of design work lives
    • The project organization and other features contribute to the ease of answering that age old question ... "where can I find that mockup?"
    • Dev Mode is pretty cool. Not many use it, so some designers may spend unnecessary time spec'ing out things that no one will appreciate, let alone look at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    XWiki SAS
    • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    XWiki Screenshots

    Screenshot of an XWiki homepageScreenshot of knowledge management, in XWiki.Screenshot of the granular rights access feature, that helps users to manage big teams.Screenshot of some of the customizations available in every aspect of an instance, from theme to templates and page structure.Screenshot of an example of migration from Confluence using the dedicated migrator.