FileHold Document Management vs. Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Redwood Reporting automatically delivers critical report output, when, where and how it is needed most. This is to eliminate the frustration, wasted time, and errors associated with manually accessing, calculating and mapping pieces of information from disparate systems and data sources. Redwood Reporting provides: Browser-based access to reports from virtually any application Push and pull options so that users have instant access to new and historical report… | N/A |
| FileHold Document Management | Redwood Reporting : Report2Web | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | Contact Redwood Software for pricing details. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | Redwood Reporting : Report2Web | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Content Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | Redwood Reporting : Report2Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | Egnyte Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | Epicor ECM Score7.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Dashpivot - By Sitemate Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileHold Document Management | Redwood Reporting : Report2Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.2 |
| Usability | 6.0 | - |
| Performance | 7.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 6.0 | - |
| FileHold Document Management | Redwood Reporting : Report2Web | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots | Redwood Reporting : Report2Web Screenshots |










