TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

FileHold Document Management vs. SAP NetWeaver BPM

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FileHold Document Management

    Score7.7 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold…

    $30

    per month per seat

    SAP BPM

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ASAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes.N/A
    Pricing
    FileHold Document ManagementSAP BPM
    Editions & Modules
    FileHold Enterprise
    $10.00
    Per user / month
    FileHold installed on cusomers own Cloud or in house server
    $15.00
    per month per seat
    FileHold Express for 5 users
    $15.00
    per user / month
    FileHold Cloud, Fully hosted on Microsoft Azure
    $30.00
    per month per seat
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FileHold Document ManagementSAP BPM
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsIn all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee.—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    FileHold Document ManagementSAP BPM
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of FileHold Document Management and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    FileHold Document Management
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    26% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of FileHold Document Management and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    FileHold Document Management
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of FileHold Document Management and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    FileHold Document Management
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of FileHold Document Management and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    FileHold Document Management
    -
    Ratings
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FileHold Document ManagementSAP BPM
    Small Businesses
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tungsten Capture
    Score9.5 out of 10
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FileHold Document ManagementSAP BPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FileHold Document ManagementSAP BPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    FileHold Systems Inc
    Scenarios that FileHold Document Management documents are well suited are to store documents, manage them and share them with other employees through the cloud. FileHold Document Management does a good job at all of these in addition to the fast loading time and ample storage space. However, other software such as good drive still remain better due to its ease of use and accessibility.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    It is well suited when we need to integrate business processes with SAP ERP and SAP CRM - the solution can be integrated with business rules/procedures defined in SAP ERP/CRM and NetWeaver can be used to monitor the rules and flag off exceptions. When there are multiple workflows running, it tends to slow down running of these processes. Also, it entirely depends on SAP portal for it to run efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    FileHold Systems Inc
    • FileHold scales well and can serve small companies up to enterprises with thousands of users.
    • Powerful workflow and approval processes.
    • MS Office Integration, version control, a powerful search engine, and cloud availability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Virtual paper trail. Iterations of process and current documentation are all stored as "artifacts", leaving a great trail.
    • Configuration of users. BPM somewhat magically determines which users will be impacted and automates rules.
    • A pro (that is also a con) is the design interface. If you know what you are doing, it is incredibly powerful and malleable.
    Read full review
    Cons
    FileHold Systems Inc
    • Whenever there was an update done to the program, we would run into multiple issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Live readings would be nice.
    • Easier to maneuver
    • Work with all systems with the press of one keystroke
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    FileHold Systems Inc
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    As a big fan of SAP in general, the BPM solution fits right in with all the other things SAP does well, and does it with incredible efficiency
    Read full review
    Usability
    FileHold Systems Inc
    FileHold is the ideal solution if you are looking for an electronic library with workflow functionality. The ease of use and integration with other tools we already use was also a huge incentive. It also allows us to import and export data. The search features and the ability to accept electronic signatures further made our lives easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    FileHold Systems Inc
    FileHold was easy to implement as well as to configure to meet our organization's business requirements. We all found the search capabilities to be wonderful, reducing the time it takes to find a particular document. FileHold is easy even for the most novice of users to become productive in a very short amount of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    FileHold Systems Inc
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    We have our own tech support for systems, I would say they probably could use more training on it, I don't really think it's anything regarding the SAP system, but more the knowledge they have on the system itself. It seems to take longer for them to fix any issues we may come across.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    FileHold Systems Inc
    I selected file storage document because it has better security feature and some employees are used to the software already. Also, I wanted to try out new software to see if there are better software out there than what I'm currently using. Google Drive doesn't offer too much security in term of their file storage feature.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    I found the initial setup of NetWeaver is much simpler than other products especially in an SAP environment where we have SAP ERP/HRM/CRM as it can be well integrated with other SAP products. The only drawback is the need/dependency on SAP Portal. It is better suited in an environment where SAP ERP is running.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    FileHold Systems Inc
    • Faster approval process
    • Better relationships with our plant [locations]
    • Improved employee efficiency by making the approval process faster
    • Improved employee efficiency by allowing employees to find documents faster through the search function
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Helped us harness integrated benefit from having SAP ERP/CRM by leveraging NetWeaver to define business processes/rules and monitor exceptions
    • Did not have any negative experience except for the fact that at times when multiple rules run, it can be somewhat slow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    FileHold Document Management Screenshots

    Screenshot of Adding documents from Microsoft officeScreenshot of The Library treeScreenshot of FileHold architecture