Formerly from Blackbaud and based on the former MicroEdge FIMS product, FIMS is a software solution used to manage requests, approvals, and declinations for grantmaking and scholarships.
N/A
TribeHR (discontinued)
Score6 out of 10
N/A
TribeHR was acquired by Netsuite in 2013. It has since been discontinued.
N/A
Pricing
FIMS
TribeHR (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FIMS
TribeHR (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
FIMS
TribeHR (discontinued)
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
6.6
2 Ratings
22% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
6.7
2 Ratings
20% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.3
2 Ratings
12% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.5
1 Ratings
5% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.5
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.8
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.3
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of FIMS and TribeHR (discontinued)
It is a very robust system and with the various modules you can accomplish much of what is needed for traditional transaction US-based grantmaking. If you have more complicated grantmaking, deal with foreign currencies or want to have tighter alignment of finance and budget numbers, GIFTS may not meet your needs. Additionally, some of their core projects have limited accessibility in terms of various mobile devices or access from outside the organization's network.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it's great for small companies to manage their basic HR functions if they do not have a dedicated department. I'm unsure of the capabilities it holds for a large company with multiple teams to organize and how the calendaring functions across departments. But, for our team of roughly 20 folks it is simple and straightforward.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While GIFTS Classic is the most barren interfaces of all MicroEdge products, there are some simple capabilities I wish GIFTS could still perform such as better email integration from outlook to a GIFTS request, more efficient requirement reminders, and a wider use of Microsoft Office and other external product integration (GuideStar).
It's disappointing that you have to purchase an additional "Customizer Module" or "Budget Module" in order to access basic functions of a GMS. This seems like a basic system function that MicroEdge takes advantage of, unfortunately.
The online application module (IGAM) is still quite antiquated and you have to be knowledgeable of basic HTML in order to really customize your organization's online application. More flexibility and design functions would be greatly appreciated with the online application function, especially since this is a public document and represents your organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would like even more capabilities, but I think that has to do with how we are using the site.
I would like to receive email notifications once a week with a summary of activity in TribeHR, including time-off scheduled by my team and any new documents or information that has been added.
I'd like reminders if I am going to go over my time off that is allotted to carry over into the new year and other pertinent vacation, floating holiday, sick time notifications.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I typically receive a response to an inquiry within an hour or two, if not sooner. Most tech support people are knowledgeable about our problems, and if not, they will escalate to the proper person.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We evaluated Greenhouse but went with net suite because we were already using some of the other NetSuite. Greenhouse seemed a bit easier to use. The others were a bit too small, didn't have the stretch to scale.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting was difficult on GIFTS - often we had to place data into Excel by hand since we could not create simple customized reports. This increased time spent on tasks GIFTS was supposed to streamline.
GIFTS did not alert us to duplicated organization records, so often it was difficult to reflect an organization's full grant history to our Board of Directors, leading to employees spending time searching through paper records to make sure all information was properly reported.
GIFTS created duplicate contact records, meaning it was difficult to find out which contact was related to which organization and cluttered our data. This caused decreased processing and response time to "new" contacts who turned out to be previous contacts or contacts whose information was tied to previous organizations. Even when contact information was updated for a new organization, sometimes the program would revert to the first organization contact information, several times leading to checks cashed to incorrect organizations---the very worst consequence of using GIFTS to our organization. Thankfully, the money was recovered upon the few times that error occurred, but it led to me and other employees reading through out 800+ checks before issue to make sure the correct organization was in fact being rewarded.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As I stated it has alleviated numerous back and forth emails with our CFO (who is only available PT) and CEO (who is often too busy to spend time on HR functions) - this has allowed for easy answers to basic HR questions.
It has allowed us to track all employee time-off in one place, saving us time from checking each individual Outlook calendar for scheduling purposes.
It has allowed us to direct all employees to one place for core HR documents and information, ensuring that folks are always getting the same answers to their inquiries.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info