Fin vs. WalkMe

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fin
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Fin is an AI Agent for customer service. It automates complex queries, improves resolution times, and delivers consistently high-quality support at scale.
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
WalkMe
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
WalkMe is a Digital Adoption Platform (DAP) that promises to transform the user experience in "today’s overwhelming digital world." Using artificial intelligence, analytics, engagement, guidance and automation, WalkMe offers a transparent overlay that assists users to complete tasks easily within any enterprise software, mobile application or website. Founded in 2011, WalkMe software is used by more than 1,500 enterprises globally, including over 30 percent of Fortune 500 companies.…N/A
Pricing
FinWalkMe
Editions & Modules
Fin with your current helpdesk
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
Copilot add-on
$35
per month per user
Pro add-on
$99
per month For analysis of 1,000 conversations
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk
from $39 + $0.99 per Fin outcome
per month per seat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FinWalkMe
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works: Intercom states that users who sign up for the Fin Guarantee Success Program and do not achieve at least a resolution rate of 65% will be paid $1M. This program is designed for high volume customers. Eligibility criteria: High volume customers (over 250k monthly conversions) in North America and Europe. Intercom states that phase one of this program will admit customers on Intercom Helpdesk or Zendesk.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FinWalkMe
Considered Both Products
Fin
Chose Fin
In personal preference, I would always pick Fin over any of the aforementioned products. For me, it's its easier to set up, very intuitive interface, amazing workflow builder and one of the most important parts it stands out above all, is the team behind Fin. Success and …
Chose Fin
We used a much older version of Zendesk six years ago, so the AI features didn't exist back then—which makes it pretty hard to compare. In any case, I immediately found Intercom simpler, more intuitive, and more professional, with features the other platform didn't offer. …
Chose Fin
Fin completely surpasses our old system for support requests. Not only can we get granular data for each customer interaction, but we also now have access to top-quality metrics and reporting. The integrative nature of Fin also made it easier to transition platforms by simply …
Chose Fin
Both are quite similar, and we use both (Fin in Intercom, Chatbase in our custom in-app bot).
Chose Fin
Forethought AI Agents, by Zendesk, Freddy AI for CX and HubSpot Service Hub
Chose Fin
We selected Intercom over Zendesk as AI was ready to use and Zendesk did not have such features. Overall it was the right decision and everything including the switch to intercom went quite well.
Chose Fin
The choice was made before I joined the company, but we've evaluated the usage and purpose of Fin across the years and are still happy with our choice.
Chose Fin
Fin far surpasses these other options in platform features and capabilities. Fin allows for side-by-side use by both the Marketing and Support teams, while none of the other similar products did that well. Most platforms are designed for one or the other, not both.
Chose Fin
Since I have worked for the company, we have not used other tools that are similar.
Chose Fin
Our previous support platform didn't offer an AI agent (they used it internally for their own tickets, but there were delays with shipping it to their users, i.e., us, so we migrated to Intercom). Our colleagues from different brands within our own company demoed a different …
Chose Fin
There are so many AI platforms available, and you could theoretically build a system using the available AI API's from any of the big platforms. However, I dont think it's as easy as this. Intercom is deliberately built for customer service, the features they are releasing a …
Chose Fin
Fin by Intercom vs. Zendesk/Salesforce - Fin by Intercom is often cheaper at low-to-mid volumes because it has a lower base platform fee (starting around $29–$39/seat). However, Zendesk AI and Salesforce Agentforce can be more predictable for massive enterprises because they …
Chose Fin
We use Fin because we already use Intercom, and it was easy to train on and implement, given our current use of Intercom.
Chose Fin
I have only used the free versions of ChatGPT and Claude but I will say that Fin by Intercom AI is built specifically around our data that we give it access to, so its going to be a lot much accurate and safer for an organization to use. We have been happy Fin by Intercom users …
Chose Fin
We decided on Fim due to the ease of creation and integration, as well as its better-developed support.

Decidimos pelo fim pela facilidade na criação e integração Assim como, um suporte melhor desenvolvido
Chose Fin
Fin beat out our competitors in price, accuracy, ease of set-up/training, and also allowed us a free demo environment during the exploratory phase without needing to sign anything.
Chose Fin
Granted I think both Zendesk and Salesforce are very good tools, I still think that Fin by Intercom is the best I've used. Salesforce can be very laggy at times, and there's nothing that can be done about it. The interface is clunky. Zendesk is coming in at a real close second, …
Chose Fin
Huge difference: Crisp is immature yet can't read images or send images; the workflows are broken and cannot be relied upon. The agent breaks in between and is yet way behind. It need a lot of work yet and will be good to go in an year or two.
Chose Fin
Although we have not utilised a specific chat box like Fin before in other websites, we have used ChatGPT and Claude within our general work. Our Product and Engineering team make use of Devin within Azure Dev Ops to support with their work. However, Fin is the most suitable …
Chose Fin
We were already using Intercom as our support ticket software and Intercom's Fin was the next logical upgrade - so it was an easy transition.
Chose Fin
Fin AI is way better than those above I've tried in my career. Easier to train and manage.
WalkMe
Chose WalkMe
I couldn't successfully implement this product for trial and found support help was delayed. In comparison, despite also being based in another country, WalkMe's support was quick to help with queries and always eager to address the issue and go above and beyond to make sure I …
Chose WalkMe
It's all about analytics and WalkMe has everything you ever needed and more!
Chose WalkMe
My understanding is that WalkMe was selected based on its capability to support our requirements for our enterprise software. We wanted a product that allows us to provide help at the point of need, provide as little or as much help to guide the user to successfully use the …
Chose WalkMe
WalkMe was much better in terms of features, implementation, and analytics. It's a market leader in the Digital Adoption space so it made sense to begin our digital adoption journey with this tool. The sales team also spent a lot of time with us in understanding our …
Chose WalkMe
Pendo didn't have react native support at the time or it would have been the solution of choice. Much better tool.
Chose WalkMe
WalkMe is an outstanding platform and its technical support is so calm and professional. Always listen to the queries well and respond out with the alternative or solution to increase a good experience of the user. The best feature of WalkMe which I like the most is the …
Chose WalkMe
WalkMe is by far more customizable and fully features compared to its competitors. This does mean it takes longer to learn all the features, however, it also means you can customize the tours to a greater degree. Most of the competitor products are between a third to half the …
Chose WalkMe
I have realized WalkMe is a great product with a lot of features and so far is the best product adoption and user onboarding tool compared to its alternatives. WalkMe is specialized in the field of product tours and walkthroughs hence making it the pioneer in the user …
Chose WalkMe
Our organization reviewed several products before selecting WalkMe as the primary tutorial platform. We chose WalkMe because our primary business tutorial need is for Salesforce. WalkMe offers an incredibly easy-to-use and understandable walk-through and integrates incredibly …
Chose WalkMe
A predecessor had originally chosen WalkMe and I decided to continue using them out of convenience, but when things didn't get better, we looked around and found alternative tools to be better.
Chose WalkMe
Our company chose to transition to our own proprietary knowledgebase system.
Chose WalkMe

Ability to make it easy for the users to use our popular products by using product-specific launchers and smart tips.

We are watching the analytics for these and they seem to work!

Chose WalkMe
Our firm rated WalkMe as best in class compared to alternatives. In addition to functionality, WalkMe university and professional services set us up to own the product and continuously improve.
Chose WalkMe
The only other personalization/on-boarding tool we have tried is Evergage. We are actually running them at the same time, each has their own strengths and weaknesses. Evergage's ability to personalize the message and be more dynamic in their campaigns is far better than those …
Best Alternatives
FinWalkMe
Small Businesses
Gorgias
Gorgias
Score 8.4 out of 10
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 7.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoom Contact Center
Zoom Contact Center
Score 8.7 out of 10
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Genesys Cloud CX
Genesys Cloud CX
Score 8.8 out of 10
Nexthink
Nexthink
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FinWalkMe
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FinWalkMe
Likelihood to Recommend
Fin is fantastic at answering simpler inquiries, where the range and types of questions are easier to categorize. Thereby reducing the subset of possible answers. Where it has shown great improvement - but still needs more improvement - is by becoming a true Agentic AI support engineer that is capable of answering more technically nuanced questions. Our product has a lot of variables used for troubleshooting that cannot be adequately captured in documentation. Even though we provide thousands of pages of spec docs, each issue is unique. Training and empowering Fin to be as good as a Level 1 support engineer is still very challenging.
Read full review
WalkMe is a great tool to support digital transformation efforts at an organization--it can reduce the training/learning time for both the users and the creators. It can also support onboarding, change management, data integrity, and creating a seamless connection between platforms and many others. It's not a tool for simple, intuitive platforms that do not change frequently.
Read full review
Pros
  • Serves as the first point of interaction.
  • Answers questions based on the knowledge base.
  • Tries to suggest a solution for reported issues (in some cases).
  • Gives the option to improve its answer.
  • Learns from other conversations and replies by humans.
  • Understands other languages.
  • Interprets images (somewhat).
Read full review
  • No more communicating via email - conditional shoutouts to relay a message
  • Automating processes to increase productivity and reduce frustration
  • Fabulous analytics
  • Training at the point of need - no more searching for the relevant training elsewhere
  • Adding a link to automatically start any WalkMe solution from anywhere using 'Permalinks' is great!
Read full review
Cons
  • It seems some users really struggle to figure out how to escalate to a human (especially through email).
  • Not excited about how "soft" resolutions still count as resolutions and are paid for. Though some abandoned cases appear to be able to be concluded as "the user got the answer they needed", there are others where they clearly didn't, because they just open up another chat (or even more), trying to get more info. This pads the resolution stats and makes it seem more effective than it actually is.
  • Cost -- Fin is quite expensive. It helps us with scaling coverage, but we're not really saving money.
Read full review
  • I would like to see some way to manage versions of the help from release to release, as currently the only way to see/roll a help item back to a time in the past is to revert to that time.
  • We had run into some issues with duplicating images in the Assets Library, but that has just been fixed!
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The platform is overall clear and intuitive. As with any new platform, there's a learning curve, but that wasn't an issue for our team (and it shouldn't be an issue for others). Fin options are scattered across several submenus, and I'd like them grouped together, but I also like having all those training-related tabs open at all times, so it's not much of a real issue for me.
Read full review
WalkMe has done a great job of making their tool easy to use. However because it is a Firefox plugin it causes me to need another browser and sacrifice the left 2 - 3 inches of my display, when working on a laptop this makes it a bit painful. Also when publishing you can organize your list of walk-thrus, the window size is small and limited to the constraints of the WalkMe tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
always there
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Fin is super quick and top notch.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I can get help by asking Fin questions about itself. It answers accurately, citing its own Help Center resources with visuals. It can reason and dialogue well. But when it comes to getting human support for Fin, it is not as quick. It can sometimes take a few days. They are polite and well-meaning. Some things aren't their fault (product limitations), but there was one occasion where something took a long time to resolve with lots of back and forth but it was I who found out the error in the end that they missed, so they didn't really help resolve it.
Read full review
The WalkMe Support Team was phenomenal. My support rep made a genuine effort to ensure my success with using the WalkMe Software. She was kind, patient, and very knowledgeable on the software. If there was a question she did not know the answer too, she would find the answer and get back to me as soon as possible
Read full review
Online Training
It was great. We were able to walk through step by step and get our questions answered along the way.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The implementation was surprisingly easy but we are having to adapt from our old process to work well with Intercom.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Fin completely surpasses our old system for support requests. Not only can we get granular data for each customer interaction, but we also now have access to top-quality metrics and reporting. The integrative nature of Fin also made it easier to transition platforms by simply integrating with the previous system.
Read full review
I couldn't successfully implement this product for trial and found support help was delayed. In comparison, despite also being based in another country, WalkMe's support was quick to help with queries and always eager to address the issue and go above and beyond to make sure I had the information I needed.
Read full review
Scalability
The product is very scalable and has helped us scale our user base and onboard 10x the users in just one month. We couldn't have done it without Fin
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • New role opportunities — Using the “Fin-first” approach has reduced the workload for our Tier 1 team, giving them more time to focus on their own career growth. It’s also opened the door to a dedicated, AI-focused role, where a team member regularly reviews Fin’s answers and makes updates to help it perform even better.
  • Enabling Fin has also reduced our response time and allowed us to meet SLA's.
Read full review
  • 79% of our customers using a walk-thru agree that it has made it easy to handle their issue.
  • WalkMe has helped us lower costs associated with phone and ticket based support. Using WalkMe to promote self help over ticket creation has reduced our ticket contacts by 50%.
  • Many on our development team are leery of WalkMe. It is allowing someone outside of their department access to modify the user experience. However our leadership teams have been onboard with it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Fin Screenshots

Screenshot of the interface to customize Fin's tone of voice, teach it support knowledge and policies, and configure how it handles complex tasks in over 45 languages.Screenshot of Fin handling a complex query. Fin can securely retrieve data and take action in external systems like Shopify, Stripe, and Salesforce.Screenshot of Fin works across phone, email, chat, Slack, and more so every customer receives accurate, personalized responses, wherever they reach out.Screenshot of some procedures to train Fin to handle queries with multiple steps, business logic and third-party systems from start to finish. Natural language instructions can be combined with deterministic controls to create powerful Procedures that follow exact rules when needed.Screenshot of the dashboard to monitor and evaluate quality against standards across both Fin and human conversations.Screenshot of the dashboard to monitor, analyze, and optimize Fin by spotting trends, filling content gaps, and fixing quality issues topic by topic.

WalkMe Screenshots

Screenshot of Reduce support costsScreenshot of Accelerate the onboarding processScreenshot of Automate any repetitve processScreenshot of Record your users in session to gain valuable visual analytics.