TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Firebase

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AGoogle offers the Firebase suite of application development tools, available free or at cost for higher degree of usages, priced flexibly accorded to features needed. The suite includes A/B testing and Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging (FCM) and in-app messaging, cloud storage and NoSQL storage (Cloud Firestore and Firestore Realtime Database), and other features supporting developers with flexible mobile application development.

    $0.01

    Per Verification

    WebEngage

    Score4.1 out of 10
    N/AWebEngage calls itself a multi-channel user engagement platform. It automates communication across a user's lifecycle and helps companies send messages via these channels: Web Messages In-app Messages Push Notifications Web Push Notification Email Marketing SMS Marketing Facebook Remarketing According to the vendor, cross-device tracking helps keep communication coherent and contextual, making the…N/A
    Pricing
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Editions & Modules
    Phone Authentication
    $0.01
    Per Verification
    Stored Data
    $0.18
    Per GiB
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Pricing is customised according to the customer usage and requirement. Contact support@webengage.com to know more about pricing plans.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    WebEngage
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    19 Answers
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    67%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    Features
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Email & Online Marketing
    Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Firebase and WebEngage
    Feature
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    WebEngage
    7.4
    6 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Dynamic content00 Ratings7.36 Ratings
    Ability to test dynamic content00 Ratings7.76 Ratings
    Mobile optimization00 Ratings6.35 Ratings
    Email deliverability reporting00 Ratings7.16 Ratings
    List management00 Ratings7.86 Ratings
    Triggered drip sequences00 Ratings8.26 Ratings
    Lead Management
    Comparison of Lead Management features of Firebase and WebEngage
    Feature
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    WebEngage
    6.1
    5 Ratings
    26% below category average
    Lead nurturing automation00 Ratings6.65 Ratings
    Automated sales alerts and tasks00 Ratings5.65 Ratings
    Campaign Management
    Comparison of Campaign Management features of Firebase and WebEngage
    Feature
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    WebEngage
    6.9
    6 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Calendaring00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Event/webinar marketing00 Ratings5.74 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Firebase and WebEngage
    Feature
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    WebEngage
    7.2
    6 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings7.56 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings7.56 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings6.76 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Firebase and WebEngage
    Feature
    Firebase
    -
    Ratings
    WebEngage
    7.1
    6 Ratings
    7% below category average
    API00 Ratings8.26 Ratings
    Role-based workflow & approvals00 Ratings7.15 Ratings
    Customizability00 Ratings6.85 Ratings
    Integration with Salesforce.com00 Ratings6.15 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Vbout
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Bloomreach
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Iterable
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (31 ratings)
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    7.1
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FirebaseWebEngage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Firebase should be your first choice if your platform is mobile first. Firebase's mobile platform support for client-side applications is second to none, and I cannot think of a comparable cross-platform toolkit. Firebase also integrates well with your server-side solution, meaning that you can plug Firebase into your existing app architecture with minimal effort.
    Firebase lags behind on the desktop, however. Although macOS support is rapidly catching up, full Windows support is a glaring omission for most Firebase features. This means that if your platform targets Windows, you will need to implement the client functionality manually using Firebase's web APIs and wrappers, or look for another solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    WebEngage can easily reduce turnaround time for product and marketing teams to execute marketing campaigns for specific user segments as well as remove any dependency on internal tech teams for the development and maintenance of automation journeys. Further, A/B tests can be executed to measure the performance of message variants in real-time directly from the panel. But WebEngage lacks a robust Analytics platform. While basic metrics such as open rate and click-through rate for messages being sent can be considered for reporting, attribution is still not the strongest suit in case the marketing team relies on multiple Ad networks for acquisition. Thus, as per experience, it's better to use the automation suite offered by WebEngage with a different data analytics platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Analytics wise, retention is extremely important to our app, therefore we take advantage of the cohort analysis to see the impact of our middle funnel (retargeting, push, email) efforts affect the percent of users that come back into the app. Firebase allows us to easily segment these this data and look at a running average based on certain dates.
    • When it comes to any mobile app, a deep linking strategy is essential to any apps success. With Firebase's Dynamic Links, we are able to share dynamic links (recognize user device) that are able to redirect to in-app content. These deep links allow users to share other deep-linked content with friends, that also have link preview assets.
    • Firebase allows users to effectively track events, funnels, and MAUs. With this simple event tracking feature, users can put organize these events into funnels of their main user flows (e.g., checkout flows, onboarding flows, etc.), and subsequently be able to understand where the drop-off is in the funnel and then prioritize areas of the funnel to fix. Also, MAU is important to be able to tell if you are bringing in new users and what's the active volume for each platform (Android, iOS).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    • Ease in creating user journeys.
    • Easy implementation of APIs.
    • Good reporting dashboard and scheduling features.
    • Segmentation of the users is easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Attribution and specifically multi-touch attribution could be more robust such as Branch or Appsflyer but understand this isn't Firebases bread and butter.
    • More parameters. Firebase allows you to track tons of events (believe it's up to 50 or so) but the parameters of the events it only allows you to track 5 which is so messily and unbelievable. So you're able to get good high-level data but if you want to get granular with the events and actions are taken on your app to get real data insight you either have to go with a paid data analytics platform or bring on someone that's an expert in SQL to go through Big Query.
    • City-specific data instead of just country-specific data would have been a huge plus as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    • Relays
    • Onsite should have more options of templates.
    • Backend support for better reachability of the channels.
    • Cohort studies should be more customizable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    I don't use the Firebase UI much, but rather connect it to GA4. GA4 has a great event model but the GA4 UI and analysis capabilities are limited. It's harder to measure product usage type of engagement but if you have the time and resources to leverage the GA4 to BiqQuery export you'll have all the raw event data you'll need for deep analysis, segmentation, and audience activation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Google
    Our analytics folks handled the majority of the communication when it came to customer service, but as far as I was aware, the support we got was pretty good. When we had an issue, we were able to reach out and get support in a timely fashion. Firebase was easy to reach and reasonably available to assist when needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted database. This simplicity has allowed us to try features that we might not have based on the amount of work they required in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    WebEngage's dashboard is relatively more intuitive and easy to understand. Further in terms of cost as well it is value to money as it delivers excellent ROI. The after-sales support is also better in terms of responsiveness and helps in case of issues with the execution of campaigns. The account managers also ideate and help in the optimization and creation of new user journeys.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Makes building real-time interfaces easy to do at scale with no backend involvement.
    • Very low pricing for small companies and green-fields projects.
    • Lack of support for more complicated queries needs to be managed by users and often forces strange architecture choices for data to enable it to be easily accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WebEngage
    • Helped in lowering cost of marketing.
    • Driving higher volume of Direct Sales.
    • Increasing conversion rate on the website.
    • Increasing lead to sale ratio.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    WebEngage Screenshots

    Screenshot of Webengage dashboard - User AnalyticsScreenshot of Webenagge dashboard - User DetailsScreenshot of Webengage dashboard - Creating Mobile notificationsScreenshot of Webengage dashboard - Creating EmailsScreenshot of Webengage Dashboard - Journey DesignerScreenshot of Webengage Dashboard - Journey Designer (2)