FireHydrant vs. Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FireHydrant
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
FireHydrant is an incident management platform designd to allow users to resolve, learn, and mitigate incidents faster, from the company of the same name in New York.N/A
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response…N/A
Pricing
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Considered Both Products
FireHydrant

No answer on this topic

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability.
Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
I have never evaluated TRAP against another product.
Features
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Incident Response Platforms
Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
FireHydrant
-
Ratings
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
8.4
Ratings
6% below category average
Integration with Other Security Systems00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Small Businesses
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 9.5 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FireHydrantProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It is very well suited for any organization, though the pricing is more for larger organizations. Having auto pull available means you have fewer worries that phishing emails end up in users' mailboxes.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Finds malicious messages in users mailboxes that were not previously detected.
  • Gives good data about messages post-detection.
  • Integrates with AD.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Would like an Azure virtual machine version of it. Currently, it's only supported on VMware and AWS.
  • Configuring authentication certificates on it is not easy.
  • It does not work with RSASSA-PSS signed certificates.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Helped mitigate the email portion of our penetration test entirely.
  • Made us aware of the amount of suspicious emails being delivered.
  • Prevented malware spreading through mail.
Read full review
ScreenShots