FireMon vs. Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FireMon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
FireMon is a real-time security policy management solution built for today’s complex multi-vendor, enterprise environments. Supporting the latest firewall and policy enforcement technologies spanning on-premises networks to the cloud, FireMon delivers visibility and control across the entire IT landscape to automate policy changes, meet compliance standards, to minimize policy-related risk. Since creating their policy management solution in 2004, FireMon states they've helped…N/A
Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Score 9.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security provides cloud-native protection for hybrid environments.N/A
Pricing
FireMonKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FireMonKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FireMonKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Best Alternatives
FireMonKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FireMonKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(69 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.8
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(3 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.7
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.9
(48 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FireMonKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Likelihood to Recommend
FireMon
FireMon is best used in a large environment (for example, I have >100
firewalls in my environment). It's best used when trying to improve
security posture and showing changes in firewall security over time. It
might not be the best choice for smaller environments or those that aren't concerned about security management.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
If you have a hybrid cloud architecture and are looking for a flexible and complete security solution, Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security is what you need. Despite some minor difficulties, the solution's effectiveness in threat detection, scalability, and interoperability with multiple cloud platforms positions it as a significant asset for safeguarding dynamic and hybrid cloud settings.
Read full review
Pros
FireMon
  • Give good real time reporting for anyone making a change to any of our firewalls
  • Provides good reporting tools that are out of box
  • Provide good customization tools that is specific to our needs
  • Upgrades are a simple process and support does relatively well with assisting us.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
  • Protection from online frauds and scams
  • Secure from data leakage.
  • Easy and fast
  • Can be accessed in more than one device.
Read full review
Cons
FireMon
  • Some features could be added to the existing functionality which include NAT rules usage
  • Rule expiration normalization from firewalls rather than entering them in rule documentation
  • .csv exports of the files from the firewall pane only gives usage for 30 days by default and that should be increased
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
  • Ease of use: We find the solution's interface and management console complex and difficult to navigate.
  • Limited scalability: We find that the solution has limited scalability options, making it difficult to accommodate the needs of larger organizations.
  • Limited reporting and analytics capabilities: We find that the solution's reporting and analytics capabilities are limited, making it difficult to gain visibility into the security status of their environment.
  • High cost, It's an expensive investment for small organization like us.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
FireMon
The shell is locked out and we can't run any general centos commands. The implementation and maintainence of the arch is very complex. Even with the right identifiers on log messages the log collection keeps failing. The warning messages on the device are ambiguous. The log messages on firemon are a bit confusing and don't show the exact issue.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
No answers on this topic
Usability
FireMon
It save me time and I'm able to have the review - review the rule independently with using my time.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
Protection against advanced threats, as the solution includes advanced threat prevention technologies, such as sandboxing and detection of abnormal behavior in daily accesses. Centralized management, allows you to manage the security of several devices from a single management console.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
FireMon
FireMon has been relatively stable overall. However, there have been a handful of times where we had issues with the console. For example, we couldn't update which devices to include in a security assessment. The initial suggestion from support was to just reboot it. It seems like there weren't many other options available such as to restart services before going to the extreme of a complete reboot.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
No answers on this topic
Performance
FireMon
I'm not sure we have the largest implementation of FireMon out there but we do have a few 1000 devices being probed by FireMon. Overall, the system's performance has been rock solid. The console refreshes quickly and reports are generated within an expected timeframe.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
FireMon
FireMon technical support is awesome! They respond quickly to our requests and they are well trained and very knowledgeable about the tool. Some issues have to be referred to the development team, but technical support largely provides solutions for any issues that we may have.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
FireMon
Implementation is fairly simple. Most issues can be resolved by referencing manuals.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
FireMon
I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can easily import firewalls and begin to work on them to improve them
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security is better on scanning and removing malware. It got automated removal and got a feature called advanced disinfection. If we can’t remove trying to restart the device the remove it also we can control everything on devices like apps, devices and even the websites the administrator can determine which group or device can access.
Read full review
Scalability
FireMon
Firemon Is easily scalable and maintainable with any size team. Although it requires some tech debt, it is well worth the time to invest to ensure compliance is visible and reports are accurate. Although our environment is very large we do not fully utilize the scalability of the Firemon product.
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
FireMon
  • FireMon's Compliance Reporting provided an immediate and tangible benefit
  • FireMon helps identify egregious or erroneous rules quickly across multiple platforms
  • FireMon took our audit process from an Excel spreadsheet into a far more advanced process with readily available context for reviewers
Read full review
Kaspersky Lab
  • It has negatively impacted our ROI as we have to spend too many man-hours managing the product and reinstalling it.
  • We have had to remove the software 6 months early due to continuing issues and concerns over the protection offered. This has caused us to lose out on licensing costs already paid for.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of