TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FitNesse

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AFitNesse is an open source fully integrated standalone wiki web server and acceptance testing framework.N/A

    BitBar

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/ABitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices. Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates with the user's current tech stack or CI/CD pipeline. Key Features: * BitBar offers one cloud for all testing platforms whether it be web, native, or hybrid applications. * Test an application across real…

    $39

    per month

    Pricing
    FitNesseBitBar
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FitNesseBitBar
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Enterprise packages are available for larger teams and customers.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FitNesseBitBar
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FitNesseBitBar
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FitNesseBitBar
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (6 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FitNesseBitBar
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Useful and straightforward. Appian and other low-code BCM tools can be easily integrated. Writing a script for a test is similar to writing a script in English. So simple to use because it's a wrapper class for selenium. FitNesse is being implemented with the goal of doing it correctly the first time. As a result, migrations of both the client and the server are made easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    CrossBrowserTesting is a great tool to use when you have a new page or new content that you want to test on an array of devices/browsers. In the diverse online world nowadays, it is nearly impossible to ensure optimization for every case. CBT allows you to get closer to that goal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Easy to install.
    • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
    • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Allows me to test on our development server with ease which is behind a firewall.
    • Using automation for my tests.
    • Screenshots of the problems on each page.
    • Ability to jump between screen sizes quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Logging can help any debug or error issues.
    • A Java/Selenium developer is needed to maintain the FitNesse keyword library.
    • Content.txt and properties.txted need to be added to the test suite in older versions to make it visible in a test run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Test case support is somewhat limited in customization ability.
    • Not a unique problem to them (or their 'fault'), but content behind VPN or intranet cannot be scanned.
    • Pricing with tier level and features can sometimes be confusing (ie. what is and what is not included).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. FitNesse, including its installation, may be utilized with a minimum of fuss and difficulty. Maintaining scripts and monitoring their output is designed to be a relatively straightforward process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    Selenium: 1. Selenium is Open source tool 2. Needs proper framework development and integration with multiple 3rd party tools 3. Not much secure 4. Needs scripting knowledge for people working on it 5. takes time and effort CrossBrowser Testing: 1. Licensed , so secure 2. Less time , less effort 3. Quick results 4. No scripting language knowledge needed 5. More coverage 6. Without any framework creation also we can test on multiple devices/browsers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It does not necessitate any further setup or configuration.
    • FitNess is an easy-to-use manual QA tool with a comprehensive report that aids stakeholders in better understanding the tested applications.
    • Automated testing suites for a wide range of websites. In addition, it is quite beneficial for the ongoing maintenance of the test library.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • By using CrossBrowserTesting we are saving many hours a week in manual work hours.
    • Our automated Selenium tests run in a fraction of the time it takes to manually test our components, so we can spend more time building great user experiences and less time triaging bugs.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots