Flowdock is a collaboration tool built around a chat and team inbox interface. Flowdock is available via app or as a browser-based solution.
It was originally offered by Rally Software Development, which was acquired by CA Technologies, which was acquired by Broadcom in 2018.
N/A
Quire
Score7.9 out of 10
N/A
Quire is a visual collaboration platform that enables task and project management. It allows users to visualize their workflows and improves real-time collaboration.
$10.95
per month per user
Pricing
Flowdock
Quire
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$10.95
per month per user
Premium
$18.95
per month per user
Enterprise
$24.95
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Flowdock
Quire
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Flowdock
Quire
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Flowdock and Quire
Feature
Flowdock
4.9
2 Ratings
45% below category average
Quire
7.0
3 Ratings
9% below category average
Task Management
6.72 Ratings
8.23 Ratings
Gantt Charts
3.01 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Scheduling
4.01 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
Workflow Automation
2.01 Ratings
5.51 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.22 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
Search
5.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
4.52 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Flowdock and Quire
Feature
Flowdock
3.8
2 Ratings
71% below category average
Quire
-
Ratings
Chat
8.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Flowdock and Quire
Flowdock is well suited for small teams and to environments that doesn't need too much reliability. I think it has some management problems that can make your life difficult if you have to manage a big amount of users. If you want just a tool communication with basic features (without using any integration or robust features) it can be suitable for you. You should try Flowdock using its free version for a small team and compare with others similar products. Flowdock delivers team chat and collaboration features, but is not necessarily the best product. Maybe some usability problems that disturb me won't be so relevant to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Well-suited for small teams. It's feature-rich and simple, but doesn't have the bug-tracking capabilities of heavier tools like Jira. Low setup overhead, so it's easy to jump in and start quickly! Best Gantt chart experience I've had in a while.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One thing a little bit annoying is that a lot of links to others Flowdock sections (preferences, external services, etc) will open a new window/tab. Each click may take you to a new window and you can get lost easily.
There isn't a quick access list to members of your organization to start a private chat. I took a while to find how to do that. The interface and usability could be better.
There isn't an app for Windows Phone.
Sometimes you try to load some conversation and it doesn't show anything. It is not frequently but happens sometimes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I go with the flow because I'm a newer employee and Flowdock works as advertised. If it were my decision to choose a team communciator for the organization, I'd recommend we go with Slack for its robust features and ever-changing/evolving software integrations. Slack is the outright innovator in the space and will continue to hold that role for some time.
Very easy to input tasks, assign them to people, and make dependencies between tasks. Workflow is super convenient once you get used to using enter or tab in the right place. Can do a lot of things from the keyboard, but the commands are not as intuitive as those in Todoist.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Private chat or channels are well implemented in both softwares and both are also very easy to setup.
Besides of some usability problemas I think Flowdock is still better than Slack in this user experience and design.
The second point is the price. Flowdock is half price of Slack ($3/month). If you are a student or a non-profit organization, you are able to get some special license.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info