Flowdock is a collaboration tool built around a chat and team inbox interface. Flowdock is available via app or as a browser-based solution.
It was originally offered by Rally Software Development, which was acquired by CA Technologies, which was acquired by Broadcom in 2018.
N/A
TigerText
Score8.9 out of 10
N/A
TigerText is a collaboration tool focused on providing users with secure communication to colleagues from any device.
N/A
Pricing
Flowdock
TigerText
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Flowdock
TigerText
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Flowdock
TigerText
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Flowdock and TigerText
Feature
Flowdock
4.9
2 Ratings
45% below category average
TigerText
5.9
3 Ratings
27% below category average
Task Management
6.72 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts
3.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Scheduling
4.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
2.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.22 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Search
5.72 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Visual planning tools
6.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Flowdock and TigerText
Feature
Flowdock
3.8
2 Ratings
71% below category average
TigerText
7.5
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Chat
8.92 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Notifications
7.72 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Discussions
7.72 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Surveys
2.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
1.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
1.01 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
1.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
1.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Flowdock and TigerText
Flowdock is well suited for small teams and to environments that doesn't need too much reliability. I think it has some management problems that can make your life difficult if you have to manage a big amount of users. If you want just a tool communication with basic features (without using any integration or robust features) it can be suitable for you. You should try Flowdock using its free version for a small team and compare with others similar products. Flowdock delivers team chat and collaboration features, but is not necessarily the best product. Maybe some usability problems that disturb me won't be so relevant to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
TigerText is helpful to an extent. I know my messages and photos are secure, which protects patient information, but it is difficult for them to use the program with me, and I rely on constant communication to provide services.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One thing a little bit annoying is that a lot of links to others Flowdock sections (preferences, external services, etc) will open a new window/tab. Each click may take you to a new window and you can get lost easily.
There isn't a quick access list to members of your organization to start a private chat. I took a while to find how to do that. The interface and usability could be better.
There isn't an app for Windows Phone.
Sometimes you try to load some conversation and it doesn't show anything. It is not frequently but happens sometimes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I go with the flow because I'm a newer employee and Flowdock works as advertised. If it were my decision to choose a team communciator for the organization, I'd recommend we go with Slack for its robust features and ever-changing/evolving software integrations. Slack is the outright innovator in the space and will continue to hold that role for some time.
Support has been top-notch. The only additional recommendation that I'd give is to create video walkthroughs of some of the basic functionality. That would have gotten us up and operating much faster than having to poke around with the product--it was a sort of trial-and-error.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Private chat or channels are well implemented in both softwares and both are also very easy to setup.
Besides of some usability problemas I think Flowdock is still better than Slack in this user experience and design.
The second point is the price. Flowdock is half price of Slack ($3/month). If you are a student or a non-profit organization, you are able to get some special license.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This stacks up well against its competitors because this is what is mostly used in the hospitals today. So when students have use and experience with this program, they are ready when they come across it in the real world job. We feel that this experience is invaluable and helps students fit into their positions better when they go into their work environments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info