Flutin is a platform offering growth tools and streaming solutions to creators and unlimited access to the world of live streaming entertainment to audiences, from the company of the same name in Austin. Event Multi-Streaming With Flutin Live, users can stream online events to all the major social media sites so that the user is basically here, there, everywhere at the same time. Connect multiple social media profiles to stream events Enjoy a greater number of…
$10
per month
JW Player
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
JW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.
N/A
Pricing
Flutin Live
JW Player
Editions & Modules
Basic
$15
per month 100 streaming hours
Advance
$19.5
per month 300 streaming hours
Agency
$39.5
per month Unlimited streaming hours
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Flutin Live
JW Player
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discounts available at annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Flutin Live
JW Player
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Flutin Live and JW Player
Feature
Flutin Live
-
Ratings
JW Player
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Support for advertisements
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Video SEO
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Flutin Live and JW Player
Feature
Flutin Live
-
Ratings
JW Player
7.8
3 Ratings
9% below category average
Video access controls
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
User management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Video link sharing
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
External video
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Flutin Live and JW Player
Feature
Flutin Live
-
Ratings
JW Player
7.0
3 Ratings
16% below category average
Player customization
00 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Embedded videos
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Flutin Live and JW Player
Feature
Flutin Live
-
Ratings
JW Player
1.0
3 Ratings
155% below category average
Per viewer tracking
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Per video tracking
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Flutin Live and JW Player
What most attracted me to Flutin is the ability to livestream to Instagram. I have a rather large following and this was critical. Their UI is also very easy to use and figure out. I wish they could figure out their latency issues for HD videos and add TikTok to the platform
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
JW Player has flexible plans that won't cost you a lot of money. If you are a startup, JW offers a variety of plans that will suit your specific needs and grow with you as your company grows. You do not need to be a video expert to understand how to upload a video, which allows nearly anyone in the office to do it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Flutin Live is more robust and offers more platforms to livestream than BeLIVE. BeLIVE only offers YouTube and Facebook and has never expanded. There are far more platforms today and Flutin is trying to keep up with the times, which I really appreciate. I also like the ability to upload pre-recorded videos, which BeLIVE doesn’t do
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a great price for service.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info