Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. IBM Security QRadar EDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Forcepoint DLP | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console. | N/A |
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
| Forcepoint DLP | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Forcepoint DLP | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
87% Would buy again 20 Answers | 100% Would buy again 11 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
87% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | 88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 21 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | 88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
85% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | |
| Forcepoint DLP | IBM Security QRadar EDR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Preparation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forcepoint DLP | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Symantec Data Loss Prevention Score7.3 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Symantec Data Loss Prevention Score7.3 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Forcepoint DLP | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.7 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.6 | - |
| Usability | 7.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 5.3 | - |
| Forcepoint DLP | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |











