TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. IBM Security QRadar SOAR

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Forcepoint DLP

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AForcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A

    IBM Security QRadar SOAR

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AIBM Security® QRadar® SOAR is designed to help your security team respond to cyberthreats with confidence, automate with intelligence and collaborate with consistency. It guides your team in resolving incidents by codifying established incident response processes into dynamic playbooks.N/A
    Pricing
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Usage-based pricing: This simple, scalable option allows starting small with an initial users and capabilities and scaling up as more users are added, as well as capabilities and data. Enterprise-wide pricing: This option is based on either the size of the enterprise-wide IT infrastructure or the size and type of data sources being secured.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Considered Both Products
    Forcepoint
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    87%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    88%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    87%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    85%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and IBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Feature
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    6.3
    2 Ratings
    26% below category average
    IBM Security QRadar SOAR
    -
    Ratings
    Data Encryption6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Splunk SOAR
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Score1.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (35 ratings)
    8.8
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.6
    (7 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.3
    (12 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Forcepoint DLPIBM Security QRadar SOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Forcepoint
    -Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Security QRadar SOAR is versatile. All the major players in SOAR field require the administrator to have coding experience but with IBM it is different. IBM's solution is a full-fledged automation solution, and not some threat-based or limited one. Meaning whatever comes to your mind, if you can write the code, you can do it. This goes from daily tasks from SOC to daily tasks of your network or security administrator or any other administrator. You can manage your ITSM solution if you want to, IBM is a playground and there is much to discover in its capabilities. If you do not have the knowledge or if you want a SOC/Threat Based SOAR solution, meaning you want automation but you want it to be limited to an area and out-of-box, you may choose other alternatives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Forcepoint
    • It has predominantly protected us from unauthorized parties and has provided us with better visibility and control over our data.
    • This software has also successfully prevented us from both malicious and accidental tasks, which are quite flexible actions when it comes to the violation of data loss prevention policies.
    • This product has been successful in improving compliance and even mitigating compliance violations, which further facilitated IT security.
    • I think there is room for improvement, as the user interface is slightly rough and difficult to adopt in the beginning. The software also hangs up at a few instances, which leads to some wasting of time and annoyance, but other than that, this software is good. The technical staff should work on the complexities for a better user experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • QRadar's ability to collect, analyze and normalize vast amount of security data from various sources is remarkable.
    • QRadar allows us to define and automate incident response playbooks which have been amazing for streamlining the response to security incidents.
    • It offers and extensive library of pre-built connectors and support for common security standards facilitating seamless integration with a wide range of security tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Forcepoint
    • Forcepoint technical support--specially for users who go with essential support--is challenging to get support on time. You need the ticket to be raised long beforehand to get support from TAC. However, in the case of enterprise support, its is not like this technical person will come on a priority basis.
    • However it comes with higher prices, especially for SMB, it is allowed to pay that amount for support only.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • You still have to generate reports manually. Reports are very limited and practically not useful.
    • The solution should not be SOAR class. Automations usually don't work. It's apparent that it's not designed for that.
    • Lack of flexibility.
    • Practically no support. The reported integration problems have not been resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Forcepoint
    We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I'd rate my likelihood of renewing the use of IBM Security QRadar SOAR as an 8 out of 10. Its strong automation, customization, and integration capabilities make it highly valuable for incident response and cybersecurity research. However, occasional complexity and the need for more streamlined usability prevent it from being a perfect score.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Forcepoint
    For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I would rate IBM Security QRadar SOAR's overall usability a 7 out of 10. The interface is quite functional and offers a wide range of features, but it can be somewhat complex and intimidating for beginners. Additionally, the configuration and customization can require a significant learning curve, especially for those without prior experience with security orchestration and automation platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Forcepoint
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I would rate IBM Security QRadar SOAR's availability as 9 out of 10. The platform is highly reliable, with minimal unplanned outages or application errors, ensuring it’s available when needed. However, occasional minor maintenance periods or rare connectivity issues prevent it from achieving a perfect score in terms of availability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Forcepoint
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I would rate IBM Security QRadar SOAR's performance as 8 out of 10. Pages generally load quickly, and reports complete in a reasonable time frame, even for complex data. While integration with other systems is smooth, there can be occasional slowdowns when handling very large datasets or during peak usage, which affects the perfect score.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Forcepoint
    Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I would rate IBM Security QRadar SOAR's support an 8 out of 10. The support team is knowledgeable, responsive, and generally provides helpful solutions. However, there can be occasional delays when addressing more complex issues, which prevents it from being a perfect score. Overall, the support experience has been positive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Forcepoint
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I would rate my satisfaction with the implementation of IBM Security QRadar SOAR as 7 out of 10. The process was generally straightforward, supported by helpful documentation and responsive support. However, certain advanced configurations proved more challenging and required more technical effort than anticipated, making the overall experience less seamless.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Forcepoint
    User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Overall, IBM Security QRadar SOAR offered the same set of functionality that was needed by the organization as offered by Splunk SOAR, but the former is less expensive and solves all the purpose within budget. In addition, integration with other IBM products was easier and made implementation of a SOAR solution much faster.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Forcepoint
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I would rate IBM Security QRadar SOAR's overall scalability as 9 out of 10. It effectively scales to handle large volumes of incidents and can be deployed across multiple departments or sites. Its architecture supports growing data and integration needs, but advanced configuration for larger deployments may require more effort, preventing a perfect score.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Forcepoint
    • The exchange of financial documents with customers creates extreme risk as data loss could result in financial and reputation damage to the customer. The cost of deploying Forcepoint is fractions of pennies compared to the potential financial impact of data loss.
    • There is some administrative overhead associated as false positives are inevitable, requiring a manual review and a potential loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It provides comprehensive MTTD and MTTR metrics and we are aware of how secure our systems are at any given moment.
    • We use linux 7.7, therefore the integrations are smooth.
    • We've been able run our online shops securely for so long.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Security QRadar SOAR Screenshots

    Screenshot of the IBM Security QRadar SOAR Breach Response solution. The software helps customers manage more than 180 global privacy reporting regulations including GDPR.Screenshot of the Playbooks Landing page, that shows all active playbooks in a single view, including how many are actively running, disabled, or are in draft.Screenshot of IBM Security QRadar SOAR’s Playbook Designer canvas, designed to lower the barrier to entry necessary to build automations through a graphical interface.Screenshot of the Tasks view shows all response tasks, organized by phase, that have either completed or are set to be executed.Screenshot of Threat Investigator automatically correlates incident information, curating an incident timeline from start to finish, including related artifacts and MITRE ATT&CK mappings.