Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Tenable Attack Surface Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Forcepoint DLP | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console. | N/A |
Tenable Attack Surface Management | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Tenable.asm, and previously Bit Discovery) is an external attack surface management (EASM) solution that integrates into a vulnerability management platform. Tenable.asm continuously maps the entire internet and discovers connections to internet-facing assets so that users can assess the security posture of the entire external attack surface, or those facets of an organization that face the public, and the Internet. It can be used to access an attack… | N/A |
| Forcepoint DLP | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Forcepoint DLP | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
87% Would buy again 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
87% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
85% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Forcepoint DLP | Tenable Attack Surface Management | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Preparation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forcepoint DLP | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Symantec Data Loss Prevention Score7.3 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Symantec Data Loss Prevention Score7.3 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Forcepoint DLP | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.7 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.6 | - |
| Usability | 7.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 5.3 | 10.0 |
| Forcepoint DLP | Tenable Attack Surface Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |




