TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Forcepoint SWG

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AThe Forcepoint ONE Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is one of the three foundational gateways of the Forcepoint ONE all-in-one cloud platform. Forcepoint ONE SWG monitors and controlsany interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and risk score, blocking download of malware, blocking upload of sensitive data to personal filesharing accounts, detecting shadow IT, and optionally providingRemote Browser Isolation (RBI) with Content Disarm andReconstruction (CDR).N/A

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.N/A
    Pricing
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Considered Both Products
    Forcepoint
    No answer on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    70%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    80%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    78%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Feature
    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    8.3
    15 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Centralized Management00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Infection Remediation00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.012 Ratings
    Malware Detection00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    UniFi Cloud Gateways
    Score8.3 out of 10
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
    Score8 out of 10
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (76 ratings)
    9.0
    (26 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Forcepoint SWGTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Forcepoint
    Over the years, [in our experience], the maintenance of the Forcepoint Web Security solution proved to be more cumbersome and troublesome with each version upgrade. In addition, it did not transition well to support the large increase of remote workers. We also experienced weird incompatibilities with the client. We have since replaced this solution with Zscaler Internet Access, a cloud-based secure web gateway solution with a client that behaves as expected, is more flexible, and requires significantly less administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    It provides great web security and will protect your devices against viruses and malware when paired with other security software and hardware. For instance, we have multiple layers of security set up so if McAfee misses something then one of our other barriers will catch the infection or intrusion before it reaches the network. I would not suggest using this product as a standalone agent because I do not think it will be as effective when working by itself. The dashboard also makes it convenient to manage devices, policies, and settings from wherever you are so it's an ideal solution for any IT department to use. I would just suggest using something else as a backup so your network isn't left vulnerable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Forcepoint
    • It prevents users from accessing websites that may have recently been created for the purpose of distributing malware.
    • It prevents users from accidentally or intentionally accessing websites that are considered inappropriate for a work environment.
    • It allows us to create different policies for different teams in our organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Provides high fidelity alerting.
    • Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass.
    • Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks.
    • Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Forcepoint
    • The user access logs contain a lot of useless information. I understand this is very hard to tackle as I've seen this across any product that logs web activity.
    • I would like to see more customization options of website block pages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • The amount of false detections especially the negative ones needed to be reduced.
    • It requires more optimization. It tends to make the PCs slower.
    • It almost doesn't have the ability to heal. This is very important as we need our sensitive data to be recoverable.
    • It doesn't have any free scanning functionality. Our users using personal machines cannot scan in case of an incident. This could be added like Malwarebytes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Forcepoint
    It is very stable, the organisation has "locked in" the product and has no plans to change or try another product. We have already renewed our 2019-2020 licenses. It is user friendly and people catch on easily when they first use it. The only downtime is when we install Microsoft updates! It has excellent reporting which help in determining how the organisation's Internet is used and also during both internal and external IT audits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Forcepoint
    Despite the intimidating Linux CLI when you use the appliance for troubleshooting, the web security usability compensates as most of the Administration of the system is done there. It is GUI based and has an easy to use UI where one can navigate around rather easily like getting reports, checking alerts, looking the whole setup under deployment to check if all services are running in one place though there are other parts to the system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Forcepoint
    The is a quick first response to acknowledge your issue and the Engineers never take more than two hours to fix an issue and we hardly get issues looking at the fact that the system is pretty stable. There is also a robust Knowledge Base in the site for known problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    The support of product was very good when we initially implemented the solution. We were getting fats replies and could see the customer approach. After a while the level of support was not following the SLA's and the replies were getting very confusing and late.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Forcepoint
    Research known issues with upgrading from the Support Knowledge base, this will enable you avoid road blocks along the way and reduce your dependence on Forcepoint Support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Forcepoint
    To be honest, once using Forcepoint for our Web Security, I have not wanted to look anywhere else. The dashboard gives me quick insight of threats, productivity, and bandwidth usage. Again, this is a layer in my security and it fills many holes. I feel safe and I do like I can just let it do its thing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation early and prevent the spread of damage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Forcepoint
    • Being a non-profit the cost is a bit higher than some competitors so our ROI takes a bit longer to recoup. I would really like to see better non-profit pricing.
    • The ease of doing a report on someone cuts down on the IT man-hours to do website tracking for managers as we can do it from a central point whereas in the past (prior to Forcepoint/Websense) we would have to ghost their machine to look for activity as well as their local servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • From an auditing standpoint, we can show that our workstations/servers are protected.
    • Even though it cant identify more advanced/targeted malware, it is still good to identify the more obvious malware which occurs daily in my enterprise.
    • Since it can be easily deployed, the products can easily get deployed on all systems in the environment for optimal anti-malware protection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots

    Screenshot of The Monitoring workspace presents actionable endpoint threat detection without the noise.Screenshot of Automatically identify the key findings without requiring manual evaluation of each individual artifact.Screenshot of Visualization displays relationships and speeds analyst understanding.Screenshot of AI-guided investigations automatically provide answers to typical questions asked during a security incident and highlight the most relevant evidence.