Forecast.it is a project portfolio management solution built around features such as resource planning and time tracking, budget estimating, and analytics and reporting, with key third-party integrations.
$29
per seat (billed annually)
Function Point Productivity Software
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Function Point is a project management software built specifically for ad agencies, design studios, and marketing departments.
$46
per month per user
Pricing
Forecast
Function Point Productivity Software
Editions & Modules
Lite (Annual subscription)
$29
per seat (billed annually)
Pro (Annual subscription)
$49
per seat (billed anually)
Enterprise
Call us
Agency (30-49)
$46
per month per user
Studio (10-29)
$48
per month per user
Boutique (5-9)
$52
per month per user
Enterprise
Call for Pricing
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forecast
Function Point Productivity Software
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Customers save 11% on annual billing. Demo’s available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forecast
Function Point Productivity Software
Features
Forecast
Function Point Productivity Software
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Forecast
-
Ratings
Function Point Productivity Software
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.86 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
8.85 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.86 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.86 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.96 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
7.25 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
5.45 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
6.34 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.86 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.56 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Forecast is well suited for tracking schedules, especially if it is only being controlled by a single department. When it comes to using Forecast in a larger ecosystem with more "cooks in the kitchen" it would be helpful to have the software more easily integrated with other software.
Time tracking - like several time tracking solutions, FP uses a clock that will track in real time so that you do not need to remember how long you worked on a project to input later.
Dashboards - I love FP's dashboards that let me track my personal utilization, the utilization of my team members and all of my open tasks.
Reporting - FP's reports provide insight organization-wide into how we are doing and where we (as an organization) are spending our time. As with any reporting, though, it is important to manage the cleanliness of your data to make the reporting useful.
Not as intuitive as its companion software, Harvest. This software takes longer to learn when on-boarding new staff. It is also difficult to view time notes without needing to physically open them up. This could be improved by expanding the "on hover" functionality. Personally, having spent as little time in workflow software is really important, as it gives me more time to code.
Because we use this software to plan schedules, items often fall through the cracks. I would like to see some more sophisticated syncing with not only Harvest but also with Asana.
Lack of integration with Asana. It would be nice to pull data from forecast and display it in Asana. This would be helpful for understanding how much time I have to spend on a project rather than bounce back and forth between web apps.
Function Point often provided reports that were inaccurate due to bad calculations. The support team would work with us to troubleshoot these issues, but the fact remained that calculations were wrong.
Function Point was purchased by a new parent company that increased prices over their nearest, superior, competitor, pricing themselves out of the market.
Function Point's interface is dated, as is its code base.
New features are being implemented not as software revisions or upgrades, but as new for-pay features.
I have not used any other scheduling software other than Forecast. The company selected Forecast because it is used in conjunction with Harvest. The pair of web apps can be used to pull detailed data. This is very important to our agency, and making data-driven decisions is exceptionally important to our agency mission.
Workamajig was NOT a good fit, after over a year of back-end setup. FunctionFox didn't have the financial integration capabilities we needed, but we used it for years and were happy with the service and support. FunctionPoint brought together the 30,000-foot view of the projects and resources with a simplified process for getting day-to-day jobs into the queue, which was essential for our organization.