Gavagai Explorer is a text analysis tool for companies that want to keep track of what their customers think – regardless of which language they speak. Explorer analyzes texts in 47 languages. The texts get automatically analyzed and the results are presented in interactive and share-able Dashboards. Gavagai understands meaning The majority of the text data it analyzes comes from sources such as surveys, reviews, emails, chat conversations, and social…
$3,000
Time used to Set Up
OpenText Magellan
Score9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Gavagai
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
Small - 3 project slots -1200 credits
€ 120 per month - More or extra credits can be purchased
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
Medium - 10 project slots - 1200 credits
€ 400 per month - More or extra credits can be purchased
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
Large - 50 project slots - 1200 credits
€ 2,000 per month - More or extra credits can be purchased
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
The Entire Web Application
$3000.00
Time used to Set Up
Enterprise
quote: https://www.gavagai.io/request-quote/
Number of Texts Analyzing, number of seats, number of projects
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Gavagai
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Buy extra credits at any time
Bought credits never expire
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Gavagai
OpenText Magellan
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Gavagai and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Gavagai
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Gavagai and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Gavagai
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Gavagai and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Gavagai
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Gavagai and OpenText Magellan
Gavagai is well suited for a B2C business that receives a lot of customer feedback in a form of open-ended text. It makes life easier for the customer experience team to efficiently identify the strengths and areas of improvement for the business. It saves a lot of time and also the hassle of analysing text data manually. It is not just a word cloud tool that shows you the words with the most number of mentions. Gavagai directs you towards actionability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I didn't evaluate many options while choosing Gavagai, I had explored a few local vendors whose capabilities were either incomplete or were not up to the mark. Their customer support was also quite poor. Also, the tool was debugged enough which led to frequent crashing. Alchmer although is not a direct competitor to Gavagai, since it's more of a customer feedback tool with additional capabilities of text analytics. I found Alchemer to be extremely expensive. Zonka on the other hand was quite welcoming to feedback from me and promised to develop additional capabilities for my specific requirements although the plan didn't go through due to internal reasons.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.