GForge vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GForge | N/A | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | GForge is a DevOps and project management platform offering tools for tickets, code, documentation, and collaboration. Available as both cloud-hosted SaaS and on-premise installation, GForge supports air-gapped networks and offline deployment - making it a fit for defense contractors, aerospace companies, and other organizations with strict security or compliance requirements. Core Capabilities Project Management: Customizable trackers… | $6 per month per user |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
| GForge | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $2,000 one-time fee per installation | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | All features are included at every pricing level - there are no add-on modules or tiered feature gates. The first 5 users are free on both SaaS and on-premise deployments. Enterprise licensing is available for organizations that need to deploy multiple on-premise instances without separate procurement for each installation. Contact GForge Group for enterprise pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GForge | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| GForge | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GForge | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 1.0 |
| GForge | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | GForge Screenshots |









