Speech-to-Text on Google Cloud is a tool used to convert speech into text using an API powered by Google’s AI technologies. The vendor states users can transcribe content in real time or from stored files; deliver a better user experience in products through voice commands; and, gain insights from customer interactions to improve service.
$0.02
per min
Smartling
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
The Smartling software platform supports localization of websites, mobile apps, web apps, software, and digital content. The internationalization platform includes a delivery network for global websites, support for mobile app localization, and other multilingual digital content.
N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
Smartling
Editions & Modules
Speech-to-Text V2 API
$0.016
per min
Speech-to-Text V1 API
$0.024
per min
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
Smartling
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Speech-to-Text V1 API
V1 offers data residency for multi region only. Models include short, long, phone call, and video. V1 does not include audit logging. New customers get $300 in free credits and 60 minutes for transcribing and analyzing audio free per month, not charged against your credits.
Speech-to-Text V2 API
V2 offers data residency for multi and single region. Models include short, long, telephony, video, and Chirp. V2 does include audit logging and support for customer managed encryption keys.
Google low latency streaming api seems to be working best when compared to other cloud-supporting tools as this will help in realtime transcription for customer interactions. while comparing azure and amazon the google support more than 125 languages and ascents as we work with …
Earlier we were completely reliant on text pad or notepad, where we used to manually capture the information, which seems to be very hectic for the long-running meeting, because holding the information and capturing them and redocumenting it is very big process and it involves …
They just remind me of each other. Whenever I have a question, whether for personal or for professional reasons, I take out my smartphone, click the Gemini app, and then click the mic to ask my question and have the answer read back to me. I love Googles AI System.
Firefly is a great notetaker application that plus into meetings and organizes the data. However it comes presctured while the Google Cloud Speech-to-Text application you can better organized the data. Then have the option to plug it into other platforms to further organize the …
It delivered high accuracy in accented and noisy environments. Regarding its language support, it offers a variety of languages and dialects. Its's Api's are well-documented and easily integrated with our GCP-based stack. Also, its deployment is fast, and it is cost-effective. …
One major setback is the integration of multiple languages, where Google has support for more than 120 languages, and Amazon only supports approximately 30 languages. Regarding the transcription behaviour, Google Translate is very accurate, but Amazon Translate sometimes spells …
Descript is definetly less accurate than Google Cloud tool, while Google Cloud Speech-to-Text does have some troubles with overlapping and background noises, it still performs better than Descript. However Descript has some video editing functions which are not available in …
Otter is good for simple note taking and its UI is quite simple. But it seriously lacks in providing appropriate transcription as it is less accurate with Indian accents and being unresponsive in real time transcriptions. On the other hand Google Cloud Speech-to-Text excels in …
We use Google Speech to Text on the recommendation of a partner who uses it, in fact we do not evaluate other applications such as Amazon Transcript or similar
Google Cloud Speech to Text has a significantly cleaner and easier-to-use User Interface. If the user is already familiar with the Google Cloud product suite, then onboarding with this software will be an extremely smooth process. If a user has previously used other …
I like Google Cloud Speech-to-Text the most when it comes to other apps I have used so far. It have reduced my work, saved lot of time and made me less stress in meetings. It has also helped us in taking requirement gathering, knowledge transfer important notes to further …
While both Speechify and Google Speech-to-text do the job, certain elements that I find missing on Speechify are: it only works on Desktop with Windows OS, the customizations aspect is missing, there is no mobile app support (people these days want everything on their mobile …
I've also trialed IBM Watson Speech to Text for similar use cases. While both are highly capable, I find the Google Cloud Speech-to-Text software's accuracy and integrations to be a cut above. Harnessing Google's speech recognition prowess has elevated our firm's value …
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text outperformed its competitors significantly in terms of accuracy, surpassing any other product available. Additionally, its support for multiple languages was unrivaled in the market. Moreover, for clients with robust bandwidth, Google Cloud …
1. It's an efficient tool for improving efficiency by saving a lot of time in typing. 2. It saves at least 40-50% of our time, thus increasing efficiency. The amazing thing I liked about it is the accuracy with multiple accents & multiple languages. 3. It also takes …
The accuracy of Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is much better than any other tool. It has better API integration with 3rd party tools. The transcription is on at real-time basis with the best efficiency. It has good language support from across the globe. It provides better noise …
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is better than these other services. The main driver is the cost for the service and what you get, the value proposition is very good. Also, the scalability of Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is great, so that down the line, as our needs change and …
We prefer Smartling as an online CAT tool because it is easy to use and we can onboard new translators quickly without lengthy training cycles. Our customers like Smartling because they can manage all of their translation needs (website, apps, business documents) through one …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Smartling
I was doing research on proxy translations tools over a year ago, and identified Smartling product as the best solution on the market.
So, I've had scenarios like when I collaborate with a team where the people are from around the world. So, I used it there, and we spoke to each other in their native language. That boosts everyone's confidence in our collaborative efforts. I've also utilized its model and the API in my projects, including a Virtual assistant and a multilingual application that allows us to learn languages from around the world. We tested it with a group of 12 people, and that's when it failed. I mean, it's not a failure, but it can't detect every person.
Smartling is great for a company or team that doesn't have the resources to translate multiple properties in-house. It automates the process and makes it much more manageable. If you have a large website that is managed by one local team and not a global team, Smartling is for you.
We look forward to seeing more in-depth reporting and user management features specifically for translation agencies that handle multiple client accounts
I have never seen a software company working so diligently to make improvements in a constant and consistent way. Their tool has truly transformed and made a great impact to localization industry
The reasoning behind my 10 is that the UI is very intuitive; I didn't require any formal training to use it. Google's speech-to-text is not just a conversion tool; it helps automate mundane tasks, saves time, and has an almost human-like understanding.
Earlier we were completely reliant on text pad or notepad, where we used to manually capture the information, which seems to be very hectic for the long-running meeting, because holding the information and capturing them and redocumenting it is very big process and it involves human work we were looking for some automation which can fix this issue then we got Google Cloud Speech-to-Text which converts audio to text files easier and faster and also it support many languages there by helping to align with various different clients across the globe and make the discussion seamless.
We prefer Smartling as an online CAT tool because it is easy to use and we can onboard new translators quickly without lengthy training cycles. Our customers like Smartling because they can manage all of their translation needs (website, apps, business documents) through one single platform, share style guides, glossaries and translation memory and save on translation cost over time.