Hire, by Google, was a recruiting app for G suite customers. The product includes functionality for applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, and candidate sourcing. Google sunsetted the product in late 2020.
N/A
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
symplr acquired HealthcareSource in July, 2021. The former HealthcareSource now forms the foundation fo the symplr talent management suite.
N/A
Pricing
Hire by Google (discontinued)
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hire by Google (discontinued)
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hire by Google (discontinued)
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
8.1
1 Ratings
2% above category average
symplr Talent Management Solutions
6.8
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Job Requisition Management
9.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.01 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
1.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Resume Management
10.01 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Candidate Search
10.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Collaboration
7.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Email Templates
7.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.01 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
User Permissions
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
9.2
2 Ratings
24% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
8.1
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
9.0
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
6.5
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Google Hire is very good at doing the basics well. I believe for most internal HR departments at small companies, this is all you need. It also works well for small to medium-sized staffing companies that just want something reliable and easy to use. What Google Hire doesn't do very well is be flexible. They don't have custom options, they don't have a ton of settings, and their development cycle is slow. As a result, it's pretty much what you see is what you get.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If their HRIS system holds all their data - employees, supervisors, positions then HealthcareSource can really take advantage of that data and save you a lot of time. We looked at a lot of systems and one of our needs was both Applicant Tracking and Performance Management and these systems work very well together. Other systems we looked at didn't have all our most needed features - we needed a vendor that could do both, integrate with our HRIS, report back data in a customizable fashion, and be user friendly. Some systems listed the features but during the demo and product reference calls we found they didn't perform as advertised. Some had reporting but the reporting was missing key data or didn't export in a data friendly manner. We have found HealthcareSource to be not only "pretty" - aka user friendly/non-cluttered but also had the engine under the hood as well that met our data analyst needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google does search well so when I search through our database for candidates, I'm confident that I'm pulling up all the right people from what we have.
They have a modern and nice user interface - this is one of the biggest reasons to use it over other systems, as most ATS' are pretty ancient looking and not very pleasant to use.
Their support is very good at answering and addressing questions.
Their pricing is incredible. I'm sure at some point it will change, but for small companies paying 100+ per user for other ATS' - it's incredible to pay 100/month for the whole company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When any company implements a new program they have specific needs that they want customized for them. Healthcare source did a great job providing excellent customer service to our HR and IT professionals working behind the scenes to help us maximize the programs potential at our organization. They did not limit us to any standard uses or prohibit us from reaching our internal goals. Some examples include specialized reports, data uploads of employee data and time frames for our annual reviews.
They provided us with training and retraining and more training on using the system. This included training new members of our team when we had turnover in HR and inviting us to conferences and webcasts regularly.
The presentation of the software was very appealing and that may seem small but it really helps appeal to the employees that use it for their reviews.
Despite many many months of requests, Google still hasn't implemented ANY custom fields. This makes it tough for an external recruiting firm to track what they want (most importantly: desired salary).
The job board integration is not great for external recruiters, mostly at the fault of Indeed. Indeed flagged us as a recruiting firm and so none of our jobs actually go live. While I know this is an Indeed problem (we had the same problem when using Bullhorn), Breezy ATS never has that problem for us so I don't know what they're doing differently.
Their development cycles are quite frankly very slow. I've requested some features, and while support is great about telling me it's coming or in the pipeline, I honestly don't really see a difference in the product since we started using it. It's still great to use, and we still love the software, but there haven't been too many visible improvements that make any difference to our work.
Being Google, it can sometimes be frustrating that one arm doesn't talk to the other. For example, they announced a Gmail for Works App/Extension integration, but for some reason when they launched it, admins of a domain couldn't install it. Google Hire pointed to the Google for Works team, and it took literally months to fix. Not the end of the world, but just very silly considering they're the same company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Looking back we can say that every year we used Performance Manager and other products too like HeathcareSource's Compensation and Position Manager we saw the ease of use for employees and HR staff members increase, we saw employees getting more comfortable with the product and HR Staff getting better at expressing their needs to the HealthcareSource team and this made us want to stay with the same company, when things are getting better each year we know we are in the right place.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
On the previous rating scale, I kept thinking "it depends". If I know it's an easy question or easy fix, the response is super fast. If I know I am asking something complex, custom or I just know it's not going to be able to be answered by 1st tier, it can take some time. I have worked on these issues with them (they are all very nice) I do now have avenues for finding things out from one person. We had one issue where we had a major problem and it required a software patch and their support team worked throughout the weekend to create, QA, and deliver the patch as promised. I was very impressed
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I picked Google Hire after spending about 3 months on Bullhorn. I found Bullhorn to be terrible. It's WAY more customizable and theoretically powerful, but it's also a pain to set up and maintain. Even just getting your job page set up on your own site required tech support. Getting it eventually to what you want could be a great benefit, but Google Hire does great right out of the box and is a lot cheaper. Breezy HR is a great system. It's a bit more expensive than Google Hire for multiple job postings, but their system is equally easy to use and straight forward. However, we are all in on Google Products, so it was just a no brainer to go with Hire for a better price and most likely a better search function.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Both Health Stream and Healthcare Source have to-do lists, completion lists, and tracking. However, the functionality of Healthcare Source is far superior to HealthStream. The notifications are much better and helpful. The tracking on Healthcare Source is easy to use and see. Overall the interface in Healthcare Source is more intuitive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google Hire makes, unfortunately, a very little impact on our ROI, but I think in the ATS world that's a good thing. It simply acts as a record that we can put everything in and easily reference, and the fact that it works overall makes it a positive software product in the long run.
While the search works great, I don't know that I've ever specifically found a candidate and placed them due to it. That could be a result of our job reqs though.
The biggest most obvious impact is really just the price. We needed a tool that does what Google Hire does, reliably. Most other companies charge at least 150 or so for 2 people, whereas Google Hire is 100/month for many users. It gives us flexibility for the future and helps minimize what could be a big expense. That definitely helps our bottom line.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
NetLearning has increased our nursing CEU credits with the most efficiency. Now nurses can take courses on NetLearning and have it track their hours.
On a compliance standpoint, NetLearning has benefited us when we are being audited and we have to show what trainings or classes an employee has made. Also, to make sure that their certifications are up to date.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info