GradPoint is a K-12 learning management system (LMS) from Pearson, supporting student engagement and communication, student encouragement and self-assessment, and other tools to support student learning and progress.
N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
GradPoint
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GradPoint
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GradPoint
PeopleFluent
Features
GradPoint
PeopleFluent
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
GradPoint
9.6
1 Ratings
16% above category average
PeopleFluent
5.8
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Course authoring
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
9.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Learning content
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Mobile friendly
10.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
10.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Compliance management
10.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Learning administration
10.01 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
10.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Social learning
8.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Player/Portal
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
GradPoint
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
10% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
GradPoint
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
11% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
GradPoint
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
GradPoint
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
7% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Great for independent learning, whether in large/small group setting, or individually. Harder for us to have students work on their own though, since it requires constant passwords to move on from one section to another for quizzes and tests. Is going to be especially hard for our students to work independently over the holidays (to stay on pace) when they can only go so far before having to stop for a password before they can go further.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
It is very user-friendly right from the get-go. I am able to navigate throughout the system, and between areas easily, going from one class to another, from one student to another, or pulling in whole classes or groups of students, depending on my needs.
GradPoint is a very useful tool for everyone - our students, paraprofessionals, teachers, directors, and administration. So across the board, it helps us all access the information we need to on a daily basis, whether in the classroom or at home.
As a special education teacher, it allows me to work with my particular students one-on-one and individualize their learning according to their IEP and learning styles. I like the ease of use and versatility, and ability to use it in the classroom and then at home, go over information needed to prepare for the next day.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
I have seen multiple mistakes in the questions/answers that need to be corrected/updated. I think these are kinks that need to be worked out and once resolved, will be fine.
When I filter for one student's name and then go to one of their courses, there is no easy way to go back and see all the courses for that one student - it always takes me back to the COURSE which lists all the students, not the one student I was just working with. Would save some steps if there was an easier way to navigate back to the one student and all their courses.
Wish there was a way I could (as a teacher/administrator) copy when reviewing the quiz/test questions with a student, so I could paste it into Google or other search so that we can research the question together. You can't copy/paste anything from inside the quiz/test review section, I am assuming for security reasons, but still, as a special education teacher, makes it a bit harder for me to go back over missed questions and review information.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
While your search bar was only able to find one (that I don't really think applies), the state of Georgia has two programs that are very similar: Georgia Connections Academy and K12. I have been a homeschool teacher for years, and am familiar with both of these programs. I feel that GradPoint stacks up very well to these other online learning platforms, and probably better, especially for administrators. My company selected GradPoint, not me, but I do believe they made a great decision, having used Edgenuity before and having many problems...hence their switch to GradPoint.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
Positive Impact: Works well with our independent sites all over the state, yet allows us to still be all connected.
Positive Impact: Works especially well with me and my special education students. Can go back over each and every missed question, review, clarify, discuss, and achieve mastery. For a special education teacher, this is just lovely!
Negative Impact: I really love GradPoint, but the only negative is since GradPoint is so technology driven, if you have a particularly tech savvy student, we have seen they can 'work around' some of GradPoint's features and 'get ahead'. I am not so tech savvy myself, but this is what my site director has told me, and I would think that is not good and should be looked at/further review/investigation.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.