Grafana OnCall vs. SIGNL4

Setting up the Grafana OnCall configuration is from the UI is a little bit complex, you need to create an integration, from there an escalation chain ann after that you need to change the template for the notificaion. Also the documentation is not entirely clear, particularly the section on provisioning with Terraform, because production stack is provisioned with infra structure as code.

Incentivized

• Interface and information visualization
• Escalations process with useful IF, ELSE alerting logic
• Simple integration with wide list of data sources and using of webhooks for non-supported sources.

Incentivized

• it's a little complex to set up
• landline phone numbers cannot be validated, only mobile numbers
• Documentation is not entirely clear, particularly the section on provisioning with Terraform.

Incentivized

setting up the Grafana OnCall functionality is complex but if you setup this and you know how to setup then the rest is easy. IAC is provided with terraform The UI for the alert groups shows the alerts in one view and from there you can go to the relevant alert trigger to solve the problems.

Incentivized

Unlike Grafana OnCall tool Splunk On-Call solution looks more complicated and noticeably inferior in the visualization of the information presented (UI is not user friendly). Alerts re-route process looks totally illogical and you need some time to get with it. However Splunk On-Call looks more featurable out-of-box and has iOS and Android apps while Grafana OnCall provides a general dashboard apps only.

Incentivized

• Reducing services downtime.
• Better users loyalty as a result of improving of intra-departments collaboration.
• Reducing the load of Service Desk.

Incentivized