Hiver is a customer service platform that brings together communication channels, apps, and data to improve customer support operations. Hiver enables real-time collaboration across every customer communication channel, offering AI and automation to resolve issues and help teams work faster. Hiver states that over 10,000 teams of all shapes and sizes globally from Flexport to Harvard University, Vacasa, and Epic Games rely on Hiver to deliver support that wins and retains customers for…
$24
per month per user
KronoDesk
Score6.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
KronoDesk is an integrated customer support system that includes help desk ticketing, support forums and a self-service knowledge base.
$190.99
per month 3 concurrent users (minimum)
Pricing
Hiver
KronoDesk
Editions & Modules
Lite
$24
per month per user
Growth
$34
per month per user
Pro
$59
per month per user
Elite
Contact Sales
Cloud
$63.66 per
per month per concurrent user
Download
$633.66
per year per concurrent user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hiver
KronoDesk
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount for annual pricing.
Discount available for annual billing on cloud plans. Discount available for volume of concurrent users. 3 concurrent user minimum.
More Pricing Information
Features
Hiver
KronoDesk
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Hiver and KronoDesk
Feature
Hiver
9.0
4 Ratings
9% above category average
KronoDesk
8.2
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
9.04 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
9.04 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Ticket response
9.04 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Hiver and KronoDesk
Feature
Hiver
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
KronoDesk
8.2
1 Ratings
2% above category average
External knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Hiver and KronoDesk
One scenario where Hiver works really well is in a shared support or billing inbox or anywhere multiple team members need access to the same messages. For example, when a customer emails about a billing question, we used to reply and manually loop in the billing team or forward the message. That often caused confusion, especially when someone forgot to “reply all” or responded only to the teammate instead of the customer.Now with Hiver, we just assign the conversation to the billing inbox, and whoever is available can respond. Everyone on the team can see the thread, status, and notes, which avoids duplicated efforts and missed replies. We also used to rely on Google Groups, but it wasn’t clear if someone had already replied, and there was no easy way to collaborate behind the scenes. Hiver completely solved that for us.As for situations where Hiver might be less ideal, I’d say if your team isn’t using Gmail or Google Workspace, then it’s probably not a good fit. It’s really designed for teams that live in Gmail so the team doesn't have to learn a new system. I'm sure some businesses will require a more robust ticketing solution but for our use case, this was a perfect option to improve outcomes, client service, and satisfaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I advise my customers to use it for all issue tracking, in business development as well as in business operations. An interface to operational systems is therefor very helpful and enlarges the value of the KronoDesk knowledge base, provided that this information is "open" to all users of all departments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The possibility to create a system/subsystem/component/interface tree of the system landscape, to be used to more detailed issue associations and subsequent detailed planning and monitoring of issues.
A quick issue entry with the most important information would be helpful.
A "live" report that can contains my current "hot" issues would be helpful.
True ticketing solutions are certainly more robust in that you can typically manage social media channels and phones, etc. But, in my opinion, when you don't have a team solely responsible for managing a ticketing system they can be complicated to implement. With HIVER, we're already all accustomed to managing our own G-Suite inbox, so it was simply a matter of teaching the team how to utilize the solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Several freeware/shareware tools like Bugzilla are missing integration with other systems. HP, IBM and CA like systems are too cumbersome and complicated for "normal" users, for me too much "hassle" to monitor issues and related information and links to other issues.
The ROI on showing how many emails are being received and addressed in a timely manner are great for KPIs
the ability to search and ensure emails are not being deleted as an automatic report is sent out the following day saying if any emails were deleted by whom
the ability to automate who gets assigned what emails from specific vendors per entity
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info