TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AHPE 3PAR StoreServ is a flash storage option, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A

    HPE StoreOnce

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AHPE StoreOnce is a backup and recovery hardware solution from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, providing disk-based backup, deduplication, and long-term storage. StoreOnce offerings can support virtual and cloud environments for small business, mid-size organizations, and enterprises.

    $1,061.46

    Pricing
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Gen10 Server
    $1,061.46
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Considered Both Products
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    NetApp does not have RDMA capabilities in CIFS (SMB) and NFS protocols. Also, NetApp All Flash FAS has no direct storage attachment available. Most configurations require additional switches for data access.
    Incentivized
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Chose HPE StoreOnce
    Price mostly. Netapp has some not so good quirks about it's licensing, which aren't there with HPE. The rest are good but the ROI is not that well since they seem overpriced sometimes.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StoreOnce
    Feature
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    -
    Ratings
    HPE StoreOnce
    9.3
    6 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Universal recovery00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Instant recovery00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Recovery verification00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Business application protection00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Snapshots00 Ratings9.95 Ratings
    Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Management dashboard00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    Platform support00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Retention options00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Encryption00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    BDRShield
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HPE 3PAR StoreServHPE StoreOnce
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a great storage device for both file and block-level storage needs. You can use it in place of SAN devices required by database servers. It provides an amazing compaction ratio and, hence, reduces overall storage footprint and cost. This is, however, slightly costly if your environment doesn't really see high transactions most of the time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    If you are looking for a backup infrastructure which is efficient and compatible for both file system and block level backup, then HPE StoreOnce is a great choice. It's easy to configure and easy to manage. We didn't have to hire a separate storage expert to set up StoreOnce for us. The HPE team helped our system admins and it was a easy to configure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We are using HP 3PAR storeServ 8200 for both our file level and block level storage.
    • I really love the amazing compaction ratio provided by HP 3PAR. Some of our disks have compaction ratio above 25:1, which is super amazing. You can definitely look for around 75% reduction of storage footprints.
    • It has a great user friendly web console "SSMC"(StoreServ Management Console). This is an additional bonus and can be used by even non-storage people like DBA and Network to take a look at storage performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We really like the deduplication feature of HPE StoreOnce. It helps reduce storage footprint by 1:3 to 1:10 depending on type of files being stored.
    • It's easy to manage files on HPE StoreOnce servers using command line options.
    • We use Veeam Backup Server software to manage our backups on HPE StoreOnce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • The system requires a physical or virtual system to manage upgrades and patches and for call home features. Most other systems have this integrated into the array. Just another piece of infrastructure to manage.
    • There are some system jobs that come pre-scheduled in the initial setup, but there is at least 1 job that should be added to this by default. When you delete storage, you also need to run a job to compact the CPG (a group where the luns all reside) to reclaim the previously used storage as free. This should be done by default at least monthly in the background.
    • There are 2 different GUI front ends that can still be used. The older version (3 PAR management console) is being phased out (has been for 3 years).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • file share based backups
    • larger drive options for the storage system
    • somewhat dated on network connectivity parts to have the fastest network connections
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We are very satisfied with 3PAR performance and especially the IOPS (Input Output Per Second) is pretty amazing. It is easy to configure and doesn't require much knowledge of storage for Tier 1 support team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    It just works and the support contract we have is good enough for the company needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    My team who are currently administering HPE StoreOnce do not come from a storage background. We still didn't had to struggle much configuring and using HPE StoreOnce. Of course, HPE team was very helpful in smooth technology transition. For critical errors, we already have phone home feature enabled and HPE support team has been excellent and their response time in dealing with technical errors/incidents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    With their phone home technology, we usually have a replacement part on its way by the time we wake up in the morning, or if the event occurs overnight. We have had great support when we had questions or events that required a call.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We had couple of incidents so far and HPE support team was very proactive through the process until the incident was closed satisfactorily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    It was pretty smooth, at least smother that a Dell EMC Unity we set it up last week
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We still use NetApp storage enclosures at each plant for our routine file shares (CIFS) but I would love to swap them out for the HPE 3PARs as we use for our ERP app data. The 3PARS are simply faster and much better at near-instant replication. But even more importantly we can get the reporting that we need from the 3PAR within a few minutes, even custom reports. 3PARs are much easier to manage than NetApps in general and I think that the only place that they compete is in compaction.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Some of our staff have worked with Baracuda, so it was a recommended product. But after our evaluation, we decided to use StoreOnce because of the types of backup, ease of administration, and cost savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We grew unexpectedly, which forced us to buy a lot of expensive HP SSD's.
    • We have never had any performance issues with this storage.
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • While not completely eliminating tape, it has relegated the use of tape to monthly and annual backups for compliance. It has reduced the recurring expense of tape media.
    • It has increased the length of the retention period because of its efficiency in storing backups.
    • The online backup repositories are now replicated to the secondary datacenter, a capability not possible with tapes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots