HYCU vs. Quest Rapid Recovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HYCU
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
HYCU offers a purpose-built backup and recovery for Nutanix available as a software solution or via a dedicated appliance.N/A
Quest Rapid Recovery
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Quest Rapid Recovery is a data backup and restore offering from Dell. It provides virtual standby, encryption, replication, deduplication, and the ability for users to run without restore.
$1,819.99
Pricing
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License + 1 Year 24/7 Maintenance
1,819.99
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing informatioon.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
HYCU
7.5
1 Ratings
8% below category average
Quest Rapid Recovery
8.6
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Universal recovery9.01 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Instant recovery5.01 Ratings3.15 Ratings
Recovery verification3.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Business application protection7.01 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.01 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Incremental backup identification8.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.01 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression5.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Snapshots8.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Flexible deployment7.01 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Management dashboard9.01 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Platform support10.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Retention options7.01 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Small Businesses
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HYCUQuest Rapid Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
HYCU
The SQL database structure and application-consistent snapshots to local storage and recovery are very well done. The interface is nicely made and it is an intuitive design that needs very little training to use. The Restore from the Cloud function is cumbersome and slow, that could be improved by downloading and finding parts needed, instead of the entire backup media.
Read full review
Quest
AppAssure works well for quick access to point in time backups of Windows machines without having to do a complete restore. The virtual standby function is useful as a disaster recovery or high availability solution. Recent upgrades to the product and rebranding to Rapid Recovery look promising. If your Linux machines are mission [critical] make sure your administrators test restores so they can perform them in a timely manner should the need arise.
Read full review
Pros
HYCU
  • Backup of virtual machines.
  • Upload to Cloud backups.
  • Recovery of databases backed up through HYCU.
Read full review
Quest
  • Continuous backup with deduplication and compression
  • The P to V function of the software is create. To be able to back up physical machines and create a hot spare on a virtual environment was a great selling point.
  • Can back up physical and virtual (ESX or Hyper-V).
Read full review
Cons
HYCU
  • The rollout of the file level backup is still not there.
  • The Restore from the Cloud function is not ideal and needs lots of work.
  • Backups being in native format would be nice for certain files.
Read full review
Quest
  • Support for newer operating systems (Windows, Linux, VMware) is slow to be added. Usually takes 3-6 months from the new version being released for it to be supported.
  • There is no way to automate the testing of the virtual standby which a lot of comparable products are able to do.
  • The software has a backup type called "base image" which is essentially taking a full backup after an unexpected shutdown of the server. If your servers crash and they are very large, this may impact your storage requirements significantly. They do now have synthetic full backups which alleviate this issue a bit but they are not perfect either.
Read full review
Support Rating
HYCU
I have had several requests, and issues with the rollout and deployment of HYCU in our production environment. The HYCU team of support and developers have met each issue with importance and some kind of resolution or explanation of help. They have been so supportive even in the not so easy ones. That says something for their product and team behind it.
Read full review
Quest
In the very few instances we've needed support they have been quick, friendly, knowledgeable, and dedicated to servicing our needs. That has only improved since AppAssure was bought out by Quest.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
HYCU
No answers on this topic
Quest
Our initial installation really was not optimum. With the help from Dell Profession Services we were able to get our implementation sized correctly and better understand how to get better deduplication results
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
HYCU
I have used several backup programs, I selected 2 just to be brief. The best thing I see with HYCU over Veeam is that it is much more difficult for an attacker if inside the network to gain access to the backups and objects saved in the backup storage. The best part about HYCU over Bacula is that it is much easier to use and more stable. The interface alone will save you from time and energy using other products
Read full review
Quest
I've been using Rapid Recovery for the last 6 years and before that we had used Backup Exec, but it was a different implementation as we were still running backups to LTO3 tapes using the full/incremental backup schemes. So Rapid Recovery (AppAssure at the time) was a big change for us, backing up to disk instead with base images and changes. I would assume Backup Exec can do this as well, but haven't used it since switching. NovaBACKUP was a lower cost solution that seemed geared towards smaller and simpler configurations
Read full review
Return on Investment
HYCU
  • We have saved a few SQL issues and recovered data that could have been corrupted.
  • Applications and files have a place in the cloud in case the need is there for other depts.
  • Restoring across datacenters is possible with HYCU saving us time and money to do so.
Read full review
Quest
  • AppAssure paid for itself in the first year of usage. A user deleted a major file in our SharePoint sub-site, we used the DocRetriever for SharePoint Console and were able to go back to a particular incremental date and retrieved that file.
  • One of our file shares crashed and we were able to put the physical server on a virtual standby which saved us hours of imaging and restoring of data. This allowed employees to efficiently continue their daily work without much downtime.
  • The offsite replication alone has put an ease on the company in case of any disaster. When Hurricane Sandy hit, we didn't have a solution in place which put us on pins and needles to say the least. But with AppAssure we will be able to have some comfort that all of our mission critical data is being offloaded onto our other sites.
Read full review
ScreenShots

HYCU Screenshots

Screenshot of HYCU