IBM App Connect vs. NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM’s App Connect is a cloud-based data integration platform with data mapping and transformation capabilities within connectors between high-volume systems. App Connect also offers near-real time data synchronization and an API builder that is adaptable to the user’s coding skill level.N/A
NetWeaver Process Integration
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration is an application integration solution.N/A
Pricing
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Features
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
8.4
9 Ratings
5% above category average
NetWeaver Process Integration
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification7.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features8.59 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
-
Ratings
NetWeaver Process Integration
6.5
4 Ratings
23% below category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings5.04 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
-
Ratings
NetWeaver Process Integration
8.5
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
-
Ratings
NetWeaver Process Integration
7.5
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Data model creation00 Ratings8.63 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings5.63 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
IBM App Connect
-
Ratings
NetWeaver Process Integration
8.2
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings8.32 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Small Businesses
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zapier
Zapier
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Azure Logic Apps
Azure Logic Apps
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
7.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM App ConnectNetWeaver Process Integration
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM App Connect Enterprise is well-suited for high-volume enterprise systems that demand robust scalability and high reliability. It excels at hybrid connectivity by easily integrating various on-premises systems using its extensive catalog of connectors. It is also ideal for workflows that require a balance between efficient low-code and the incorporation of complex, custom Java logic. On the other hand, the platform is less appropriate in scenarios requiring high development autonomy, as installation and configuration at the server level is excessively complex, creating a strong dependency on other infrastructure teams. It is also not ideal if detailed traceability and monitoring of workflows must be seamlessly managed within the tool itself, as this is difficult to manage directly in ACE. IBM App Connect Enterprise está bien adaptado para sistemas empresariales de alto volumen que exigen una escalabilidad robusta y alta confiabilidad. Sobresale en la conectividad híbrida al integrar fácilmente diversos sistemas locales (on-premises) utilizando su amplio catálogo de conectores. Además, es ideal para flujos que requieren un equilibrio entre el low-code eficiente y la incorporación de lógica Java compleja y personalizada. Por otro lado, la plataforma es menos apropiada en escenarios donde se requiere una alta autonomía de desarrollo, debido a que la instalación y configuración a nivel de servidor es excesivamente compleja , lo cual crea una fuerte dependencia de otros equipos de infraestructura. Tampoco es ideal si la trazabilidad detallada y el monitoreo de los flujos deben gestionarse sin problemas dentro de la propia herramienta, ya que esto resulta difícil de manejar directamente en ACE. Parts of this review were originally written in Spanish and have been translated into English using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
SAP
I would recommend using NetWeaver Process Integration with an SAP application only. SAP ISU/ECC can integrate with the PO very well to interact with non-SAP systems. It's best suited for extracting data from SAP systems into flat files, encrypt it, and sFTP to any 3rd party vendor.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Just the ability to display and consume data through a single dashboard makes this a great application for our business purposes.
  • With the ability to consume their exposed API, data validation and manipulation becomes a breeze.
Read full review
SAP
  • Combined advantages of advanced business application programming (ABAP) and Java
  • SAP with [other] SAP products and SAP with other solutions
  • Real-time customer service
  • Cascade data model
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • modernization made easy, when a modernized project is created by importing a java code.
  • more pre-built connectors
  • watsonx code assistance for ESQL capability.
Read full review
SAP
  • Complicated UI. Could be more simple.
  • Need more clear instructions on development environment.
  • Hard to debug errors.
  • Have many dependencies like Basis support.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
It is the best on-premise application to cloud integration in the market. I guess IBM is planning to integrate IBM App Connect with the IBM API Connect solution.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
You can do some really powerful things with this system. The overall design is an attempt to make configurable some of the routine tasks/common functionality, but allow for development/customization of the core of the application.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
Usually, the IBM Ops team provides a resolution or a response for 80% of defects raised in my project. There is one which has been open on their end for more than 3 months. With literally no response even after multiple follow-ups.
Read full review
SAP
It works great for integrating SAP applications. Without the box connectors and integration flows, the speed of development is fast. However, It has challenges in connecting other non-sap applications.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM App Connect started as MQSeries Integrator (MQSI) more than 20 years ago. In the IT environment, this is like an eternity. And this allowed a lot of customer experience and needs to be embedded in the product. Without it becoming a legacy application. The changes done in the latest version are preparing it for a Cloud/containers world without losing the previously learned knowledge.
Read full review
SAP
I was not included in selecting product process
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • We never implemented Cast Iron in production. When compared to five competing products in the iPaaS space it didn't make it past the first few test scenarios we threw at it.
Read full review
SAP
  • It reduces integration costs.
Read full review
ScreenShots