IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload…
N/A
Microsoft IIS
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft IIS is an application server and infrastructure.
N/A
SAP BPM
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes.
N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Microsoft IIS
SAP NetWeaver BPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Microsoft IIS
SAP BPM
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Microsoft IIS
SAP NetWeaver BPM
Features
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Microsoft IIS
SAP NetWeaver BPM
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
6.6
15 Ratings
16% below category average
Microsoft IIS
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
-
Ratings
Scalability
6.515 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration
6.715 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft IIS
8.2
29 Ratings
3% above category average
SAP NetWeaver BPM
-
Ratings
IDE support
00 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security management
00 Ratings
8.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Administration and management
00 Ratings
7.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Application server performance
00 Ratings
9.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Installation
00 Ratings
10.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance
00 Ratings
7.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft IIS
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
25% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft IIS
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Microsoft IIS
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Social collaboration tools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
It would be a good solution for running serverless applications. Because infrastructure setup and maintenance expenses can be avoided, the investment will pay for itself. The time to value is short, allowing IT to respond to business demands quickly. It aided us in customizing security as well as operating a personal project using to autoscale up and down approach. Also, because there isn't much hassle, items can be pushed into production as soon as possible. Simply push a container, create an application, and you're ready to go. But, It is less suited when you have a static machine or need to keep data in some way and do not want to utilize network storage or a database.
Publishing applications or websites is easy with Microsoft IIS. You don't need external software or complicated tutorials involving command lines and editing configuration files. On other hand, sometimes the troubleshooter needs a high knowledge of Windows Server, Registry, and tools to debug the application. If you need to host non-Microsoft technology as PHP pages or have a low budget, I recommend IIS equivalent software as Apache.
It is well suited when we need to integrate business processes with SAP ERP and SAP CRM - the solution can be integrated with business rules/procedures defined in SAP ERP/CRM and NetWeaver can be used to monitor the rules and flag off exceptions. When there are multiple workflows running, it tends to slow down running of these processes. Also, it entirely depends on SAP portal for it to run efficiently.
A big advantage that we use all the time is reviewing the logs that automatically get generated in IIS. It has helped us troubleshoot various problems in our applications over the years.
IIS integrates really well with Visual Studio and TFS. We are able to quickly deploy new applications and changes to applications when requested by the business.
IIS has proven that it is easy to configure and maintain with minimal effort.
the pricing structure is complicated, and the servers are expensive. I really think they should offer better pricing options and support for more languages
sometimes the servers go down, and they take too long to respond to support tickets
uploading documents is slow since I have to do it one by one, making the process much longer than it should be
We have no intention to replace all applications running on top of the IIS platform. Not all applications support other platforms and not all support staff are skilled in Linux/Apache platform support. Whereas IIS may not be the best performing or most secure web platform available, for the aforementioned reasons, it is impossible not to continue use of this product.
Consumers can purchase individual components as well as unlocking new bundles with special features and services including the extensive data management governance capabilities of the Automation range. Kubernetes containerizing for effective service implementation and an agile, flexible multi-cloud data program help both utilization expansion and deployment to be improved by this architecture.
As I've mentioned earlier, Microsoft IIS is very simple and easy to use. The user interface is a little bit overloaded with a huge number of different options, but once you have a little clue of what you are doing and what you need - no issues at all.
ARR (application request routing) in Microsoft IIS Server enables the web-admins to increase the web app reliability and availability through the rule based routing and load balancing of HTTP requests which in turn provides highly available server. IIS 7.0 Manager also provides kernel as well as user mode caching for faster performance and in case if the server fails, the IIS server has good amount of details logged in its log files which help understand and debug the cause quickly. Load balancing facilitates IIS server to fight against availability issues.
In my experience, I have never had significant issues with IIS performance. Sometimes I've experienced issues with loading time, but it is mostly related to the web site code. However Amazon, Microsoft and Google providing free cloud services with very limited resources, and in that scenario, "heavy" websites on IIS could be the issue. In other situations - performance is good.
As mentioned earlier there is so much documentation or guides or stack overflow questions out there that someone will have faced the same or very similar scenario to what you are going through that you will almost certainly find a solution to what you are after.
We have our own tech support for systems, I would say they probably could use more training on it, I don't really think it's anything regarding the SAP system, but more the knowledge they have on the system itself. It seems to take longer for them to fix any issues we may come across.
What impresses me most about IBM Cloud Code Engine is the container workload management capability and the Cloud services and dataflow monitoring functionalities. Data security and network security control via IBM Cloud Code Engine is quite excellent and very responsive data integration functions and the first deployment is not very technical.
Apache is java. Java is unnecessary complex. No developer wants to invest in learning all the hundreds of text based configuration files to get something done. Also, apache gives you the most evil and un-usable user interface possible. [Microsoft] IIS makes [life] after development easy, which is already complex enough to be bothered by something as mundane as exposing your work over the internet.
I found the initial setup of NetWeaver is much simpler than other products especially in an SAP environment where we have SAP ERP/HRM/CRM as it can be well integrated with other SAP products. The only drawback is the need/dependency on SAP Portal. It is better suited in an environment where SAP ERP is running.
Microsoft IIS Server is scalable if the underlying server configuration is done correctly. Use x64 edition v/s 32bit and using 32bit mode application pools are some of the tweaks to be done to make the IIS server scalable. There are too many small configurations need to be carried out in order to make a highly scalable IIS server hence not giving full score in this area.