IBM Cloud Code Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload…N/A
Java Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Java Cloud Service, a PaaS supporting the fast and easy development of Java applications.
$0.15
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud Code EngineOracle Java CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard Edition
$0.15485
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Enterprise Edition
$0.15485
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
High Performance Edition
$0.3871
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Code EngineJava CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Code EngineOracle Java CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Considered Multiple Products
IBM Cloud Code Engine

No answer on this topic

Java Cloud
Chose Oracle Java Cloud
Google App Engine is great for Java applications where you are using other Google components already, for example Google GCP, Google BigQuery, etc. Redhat, OpenShift, and Pivotal CloudFounder are great when the application is very complex and includes components that are Java …
Oracle WebLogic Server

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM Cloud Code EngineOracle Java CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
6.6
15 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Java Cloud
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Scalability6.515 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration6.715 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Oracle Java Cloud
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
36 Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.036 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings00 Ratings8.535 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.036 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Code EngineOracle Java CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Code EngineOracle Java CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
6.7
(15 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
7.5
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
6.3
(11 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Code EngineOracle Java CloudOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It would be a good solution for running serverless applications. Because infrastructure setup and maintenance expenses can be avoided, the investment will pay for itself. The time to value is short, allowing IT to respond to business demands quickly. It aided us in customizing security as well as operating a personal project using to autoscale up and down approach. Also, because there isn't much hassle, items can be pushed into production as soon as possible. Simply push a container, create an application, and you're ready to go. But, It is less suited when you have a static machine or need to keep data in some way and do not want to utilize network storage or a database.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Java Cloud is especially appropriate for moderate to complex Java applications. Due to BYOL licensing, it is also works well when you are planning to do dev and test in-house and then deploy it on Oracle Java Cloud. It is not well suited for simple Java applications due to the cost of Oracle Java Cloud. Simple applications don't need the fully managed aspect of Oracle Java Cloud.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Managed Environment for partners and customers - shifting skills and speed to CSP
  • A variety of programming model support
  • Elastic scalability for cloud native development and speed
  • Flexible consumption model
  • Containerized workloads with horizontal scalability
  • Here is an example - live demo walk-thru delivered to partners and community:
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCBClYgpDFg
Read full review
Oracle
  • Integration with development tools
  • Auto scale
  • Enhanced security
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • the pricing structure is complicated, and the servers are expensive. I really think they should offer better pricing options and support for more languages
  • sometimes the servers go down, and they take too long to respond to support tickets
  • uploading documents is slow since I have to do it one by one, making the process much longer than it should be
Read full review
Oracle
  • Pricing can certainly be improved as the cost adds up for dev/test environments using the Oracle Java Cloud platform.
  • It is hard to customize Oracle Java Cloud for complex Java applications requiring high bandwidth memory and network requirements.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
  • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
  • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Since this capability supports a wide variety of use cases - all on non proprietary and open technology based frameworks
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
Consumers can purchase individual components as well as unlocking new bundles with special features and services including the extensive data management governance capabilities of the Automation range. Kubernetes containerizing for effective service implementation and an agile, flexible multi-cloud data program help both utilization expansion and deployment to be improved by this architecture.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
What impresses me most about IBM Cloud Code Engine is the container workload management capability and the Cloud services and dataflow monitoring functionalities. Data security and network security control via IBM Cloud Code Engine is quite excellent and very responsive data integration functions and the first deployment is not very technical.
Read full review
Oracle
We selected Oracle Java Cloud for its native integration with other Oracle solutions and its focus on Java applications. Overall, our experience with Oracle Java Cloud has been positive, as it has improved our efficiency, security, and scalability in developing cloud applications.
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • [One] positive is that we have one tool to learn (and a simple one) for all kinds of deployment. We need less people to maintain the system.
  • We have saved a lot of time on trouble shooting. It's clear how it works. It's "just" kubernetes..
Read full review
Oracle
  • Positive impact on ROI by reducing the time to deploy Java applications in the cloud.
  • Positive impact on business objectives by reducing the CapEx needed to hire staff to deploy and then later maintain the Java instances.
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots

Screenshot of