TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Cognos Analytics

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.

    $11.25

    per month per user

    Kibana

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AKibana allows users to visualize Elasticsearch data and navigate the Elastic Stack so you can do anything from tracking query load to understanding the way requests flow through your apps.N/A

    QlikView

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AQlikView® is Qlik®’s original BI offering designed primarily for shared business intelligence reports and data visualizations. It offers guided exploration and discovery, collaborative analytics for sharing insight, and agile development and deployment.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    Editions & Modules
    On Demand - Standard
    USD 11.25
    per month per user
    On Demand - Premium
    USD 44.90
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    QlikView
    Custom
    per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——On an perpetual license basis, based on server plus number of users. Contact vendor for pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    Tableau, Power BI, QlikView were the other options considered. Tableau lacked the following key components of business intelligence and analytics. Some other statistical functions that are available on the platform were not matched by Power BI. QlikView lacked robust …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    IBM is a titan in BI innovation but has arduous competitors as I mentioned before. IBM has prestige in BI and the directors and managers know that. On the other hand, complexity is not the strategy of Cognos, that's why if you need big cubes of data, Tableau, and Microsoft BI …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cognos Analytics
    • SpagoBI
    • Qlikview
    • Tableau
    Elastic
    No answer on this topic
    Qlik
    Chose QlikView
    My use of Cognos was as an embedded BI tool inside of a cloud HCM. At the time, you could not marry up data from other external sources with that version. QlikView makes it easy to connect data from multiple sources. As a BI tool I do prefer the Cognos set up, but that's more …
    Incentivized
    Chose QlikView
    QlikView can be implemented much faster. It has a more user-friendly interface. The implementation team is cheaper. It works with larger amounts of data easily and is more innovative.
    Incentivized
    Chose QlikView
    I used an old version of Cognos and it didn't stand a chance against QlikView. I now use BO Data Services and it's just a different tool than QlikView. Its hard to compare them.
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    95 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    81 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    94 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    14 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    57 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    67 Answers
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.7
    141 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Kibana
    7.0
    5 Ratings
    14% below category average
    QlikView
    8.6
    68 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports7.6132 Ratings6.02 Ratings8.050 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards8.0139 Ratings8.05 Ratings9.766 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.5134 Ratings7.03 Ratings8.060 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.9
    141 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Kibana
    6.7
    5 Ratings
    16% below category average
    QlikView
    8.1
    67 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Drill-down analysis7.4139 Ratings8.05 Ratings8.166 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities8.3142 Ratings7.04 Ratings7.967 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages7.299 Ratings5.01 Ratings8.336 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration8.6136 Ratings6.94 Ratings8.162 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.2
    139 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Kibana
    6.8
    2 Ratings
    18% below category average
    QlikView
    8.6
    62 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Publish to Web9.838 Ratings8.02 Ratings8.049 Ratings
    Publish to PDF8.3135 Ratings8.02 Ratings9.056 Ratings
    Report Versioning9.836 Ratings6.02 Ratings7.542 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling8.2137 Ratings6.02 Ratings10.048 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers9.820 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.4
    127 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Kibana
    6.7
    4 Ratings
    14% below category average
    QlikView
    7.4
    58 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.9124 Ratings8.04 Ratings8.055 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.0117 Ratings7.02 Ratings7.546 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics6.7113 Ratings6.02 Ratings6.85 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.950 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.8
    133 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Kibana
    -
    Ratings
    QlikView
    6.7
    60 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)7.5132 Ratings00 Ratings8.159 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model7.5130 Ratings00 Ratings5.355 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)7.4130 Ratings00 Ratings5.455 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control8.260 Ratings00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)8.6114 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    6.3
    111 Ratings
    21% below category average
    Kibana
    -
    Ratings
    QlikView
    8.0
    47 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access6.7106 Ratings00 Ratings8.044 Ratings
    Mobile Application6.392 Ratings00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.698 Ratings00 Ratings8.038 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of IBM Cognos Analytics and Kibana and QlikView
    Feature
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.1
    89 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Kibana
    -
    Ratings
    QlikView
    -
    Ratings
    REST API7.685 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API7.781 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames9.914 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Java API9.915 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)9.917 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.911 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    Small Businesses
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    Looker Studio
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Jaspersoft Community Edition
    Score7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (161 ratings)
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    7.6
    (88 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.4
    (31 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (29 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (10 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (15 ratings)
    Availability
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (9 ratings)
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    3.3
    (15 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (13 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    8.6
    (40 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (43 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.3
    (40 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (43 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.5
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Cognos AnalyticsKibanaQlikView
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    We are a larger, more established company with a backlog of data in Excel and multiple departments. Everything was on Excel sheets in a file being run manually monthly. I think it is a good bridge for a company that was stuck in the 2000's but isn't ready to come to 2026 yet. It's for a company that needs a reporting solution and has needed it for quite some time but not a techy company with lots of integration issues and reports in 5 different places.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    Kibana is indeed a powerful tool and has many use cases especially in environments that rely heavily on real-time log analysis and visualisation. Kibana’s ability to handle large volumes of log data and present it in an accessible, searchable format is invaluable. We use Kibana to monitor security related issues and it proactively alerts our Slack channels about any anomality or issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    Sales data validations have helped manage our justifications in the past, especially with regard to new product development and new business introduction. It has also been helpful in identifying trends with business impact and direction specific to quarter and monthly sales from ERP data as well as decisions to purchase equipment of staffing based on run rates and product demand.
    One thing that can get out of hand is data output - if you aren't careful in your query, you may be overloaded with data dumps and drown in the amount of info you have to filter through. This is a user caution, not a comment on the software itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Enterprise reporting - Create, customise, and run reports on sales trends, consumer sentiment, etc.
    • Dashboard creation and data exploration & analysis - Using drag and drop feature to create ad-hoc visualisation. Additionally, using AI powered natural language query feature for data analysis and dashboard input (formation of pie, bar, line charts). It's useful for no-technical person to put queries around the spreadsheet data to get quick answers.
    • Building insights for accurate decision making - Package reports with data backed insights for stakeholders in pdf, and Excel format to support business ad-hoc cases, forecasting and strategic recommendations on relevant asks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    • Fast searches with powerful index.
    • Beautiful data visualizations.
    • Real-time observability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    • QlikView has a simple, relational data model that's REALLY fast. Filtering and changing data is dead simple results are almost immediately available.
    • The free version of Qlikview is almost completely featured, so you roll a pro-level product out to an entire department for really cheap.
    • QlikView is really flexible--if you can imagine it, you can build it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
    • Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    • Some performance issues with large datasets.
    • Linking to dashboards makes extremely long urls.
    • Lack of reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    • We found that QlikView can be a bit slow in supporting some forms of encryption. It is web-based and we needed to upgrade all of our server to not support the older SSL and TLS 1 protocols, only support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. However, QlikView could not run with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. We had to wait over six months to get a version that would handle the newer TLS versions.
    • There are so many options with QlikView that you can get lost when developing a visualization. There are still items I have not yet figured out, such as labeling a graph with the name of a selected detail item.
    • QlikView works by pulling the data it is going to use for visualization into its database. I am a security reviewer and I need to make certain that PII and PHI is not pulled by QlikView for a visualization, otherwise this could become a reportable indecent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    Ease of use, ability to load from pretty much any data source. today I created an application that loaded time sheets from excel that are not in a table format. With Qlik's "enable transformation steps" I was able to automate loads of multiple spreadsheets and multiple tabs easily. Could not do that with any other tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
    Read full review
    Elastic
    Its usability is generally good and it provides teams with a basic to intermediate understanding about data visualization. It is very user-friendly when it comes to creating dashboards. The UI is very good and simple. Its integration with other tools for alerting and reporting is amazing. But its advance features have a learning curve and a first timer needs some time to use the advance features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    QlikView is very easy to implement. The installation is very straight forward. QlikView has several different data connectors that can connect to different data sources very smoothly. The user interface to build the reports is very easy to understand. This helps to have a smaller learning curve. Something very helpful is that QlikView is a browser application for the end users. So, you don't need to install any applications on the user's computer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    We have not had any downtime issues with the product nor uncovered any significant bugs
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    It is not a SAAS product.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    We did not use the official Kibana support. Documentation was easy enough to follow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    My experience with the Qlik support team has been somewhat limited, but every interaction I have had with them has been very professional and I received a response quickly. Typically if there is a technical issue, our IT team will follow up. My inquiries are specific to product functionality, and Qlik has been very helpful in clarifying any questions I might have.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IBM
    Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    My team attended, but I cannot myself rate, but I think it was good as they've successfully launched a training program at our company themselves for users. It was 3-4 day training.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    Training was as expected. The demo environments tend to be more fully featured that our own environment, but the training was clear and well delivered.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    "Implementation" can mean a few things... so I'm not sure that this is the answer you want.... but here it goes: To me, implementation means: "Is the user interface intuitive and can I produce meaningful reports with ease?" On that score, I'd say YES. The amount of training required was minimal and the results were powerful. The desktop implementation is a simple, "blank" interface just waiting for your creativity. The pre-populated templates give you a reasonable start to any project -- and a good set of objects to "play around with" if you're just getting started. Finally, note that the "implementation" I used was baked into QuickBooks 2016 Enterprise -- called "Advanced Reporting"..... That integration makes it ultra useful and simple.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Cognos has the edge over Crystal Reports because you have to create any ODBC/JDBC setups. Cognos provides the ability to created scheduled reports where as SAP requires additional parameters to achieve this functionality. This next thing that I'm about to mention serves as a BIG advantage - Crystal Reports has to be installed onto each User's PC which is time consuming for a Bank that has hundreds of Employees where as Cognos of course doesn't require this process as its a cloud app and even better, Users sign into to the app via SSO (Single Sign On).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    Kibana is free; it was the first and only thing we've tried in this area.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    The only other vendor product that I have worked with that provides a similar experience to Qlikview is Tableau. I would recommend Tableau if your use case is to build a fixed dashboard. You can share reports for free without needing to buy additional licenses. I would recommend Qlikview if your users are looking for a more interactive experience. They can create new objects to represent the data which can't be accomplished as easily in Tableau
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    We rate IBM Cognos Analytics a 9 out of 10 for overall scalability. The platform handles large numbers of users, reports, and analytical workloads very reliably. We have experienced strong performance even in demanding enterprise environments with substantial data volumes. Its architecture provides sufficient flexibility to scale resources according to demand, making it well suited for large, business-critical deployments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    No answers on this topic
    Qlik
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • The platform can be pretty pricey.
    • Convoluted contracts and they fine you for any breach during audits.
    • Things are changed between releases without any warning and break.
    • It is second to none at being able to customize list and crosstab type reports.
    • You can easily set up a report to be emailed out every day and even have it export the report to a shared folder.
    • On-prem environments can be scaled up pretty much as much as you would like.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Elastic
    • Issues that affect checkout experiences for customers are able to be prioritized and solved quickly.
    • We are able to more efficiently use resources due to the automation of reporting alerts. Decreasing employee resources needed.
    • Visualization allows us to quickly share issues and explain to coworkers in order to escalate issues that can cost our bottom line.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlik
    • You can use the free desktop version to do a lot of reporting and analysis work more quickly so the ROI is huge
    • QlikView is great at finding outliers such as data entry errors
    • QlikView is great at helping you quickly discover new insights about your business that can prompt you to take action that can immediately affect your cash flow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    QlikView Screenshots

    Screenshot of QlikView Sales DashboardScreenshot of QlikView on all devicesScreenshot of QlikView using mobile touch screen