IBM Confluent vs. Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Salesforce Platform is designed for building and deploying scalable cloud applications with managed hardware provisioning and app stacks. Lightning Web Components are used by developers to build reusable UI components. | $25 Per User Per Month |
| IBM Confluent | Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Would buy again 25 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Delivers good value for the price 21 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 82% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Usability | - | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| IBM Confluent | Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |


