IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. TimeXtender vs. Visual KPI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
TimeXtender
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TimeXtender was designed to be a holistic solution for data integration that empowers organizations to build data solutions 10x faster using metadata and low-code automation.
$1,600
per month
Visual KPI
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Visual KPI is a business intelligence software offering from Transpara.N/A
Pricing
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOn-Demand pricing is pay as you go, month-to-month, with no commitment, at the "on-demand" price of $3.33/credit.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Features
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
5% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
-
Ratings
Connect to traditional data sources9.94 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL7.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
16% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
-
Ratings
Simple transformations10.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Complex transformations9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
2% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
-
Ratings
Data model creation8.72 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Metadata management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow8.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration8.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Testing and debugging7.14 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.7
4 Ratings
19% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
-
Ratings
Integration with data quality tools10.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools9.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
8.2
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
8.4
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
8.2
2 Ratings
0% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
7.6
2 Ratings
5% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings5.52 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
7.3
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
7.8
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Visual KPI
8.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
dbt
dbt
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(5 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM InfoSphere Information ServerTimeXtenderVisual KPI
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
Read full review
TimeXtender
TimeXtender has worked really well with our customers who have different data sources using complex data types in large quantities requiring a DW-like solution that can consolidate all data sources at one-HUB. TimeXtender does this well, and provides automation capabilities, the ability to easily handle slowly changing dimensions, handing data lineage and data security very well. TimeXtender has the ability to be very customizable, allowing the HUB to grow as your business does. TimeXtender's customer support team is super helpful and will work with you throughout your implementation to make sure you reach success with the product. The ROI for timeXtender versus competing products (there aren't many that do what timeXtender does) shows the investment to be worthwhile for the majority of organizations in today's data-rich corporate world.
Read full review
Transpara
[Visual KPI is well suited for:] 1. Maintenance or field worker in oil & gas/chemical/ process industry mostly; machines status on the map & functionality for tracing exact location of the machines. 2. Key personnel of the site is always in move within the site/plant; useful for monitoring key performance indicators of the plant 3. KPIs to be built based on multiple data sources as well as integration with ERP tool
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
  • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
  • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
Read full review
TimeXtender
  • It has the ability to create one dynamic 'DW' or source of truth, consolidating all data sources in one HUB.
  • Ease of use, with a great UI that is easy to learn and adapt to.
  • Ease/speed of complex implementation.
Read full review
Transpara
  • The latest user interface makes it easier to use.
  • The search function helps find projects quickly.
  • It covers a lot of areas of your business so there is intrinsic value to how robust it is.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
  • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
  • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
Read full review
TimeXtender
  • Product Marketing: As implementers and resellers of this technology, we loved it. But, convincing clients who had not previously heard of TX/Discovery Hub was more difficult than it could have been if the company had a larger marketing force behind it.
  • Relatively New to Market: it creates a learning curve for early implementers.
  • More information should be published on timeXtender's website about product lines, including testimonials.
Read full review
Transpara
  • Intelligent prediction & AI
  • Deep integration is limited to OSISoft's PI AF; bit time consuming for large integration for other historians > mapping hierarchy
  • Template to create Apps like OEE, Cycle time etc for rapid deployment
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
  • Scale of implementation
  • IBM techsupport
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Transpara
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Transpara
1. At large it was successful implementation. - [Users] are empowered to find out performance measures easily - issues like machine downtime, trend analysis, location specific downtime information, roll out functionalities, up time of the machines or area, alert based on run hour of the machines/ pumps, manual data entry to capture reason code for any downtime
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Transpara
1. Online documentation 2. How to do videos 3. Very supportive customer support 4. Excellent & user centric sales team
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
Read full review
TimeXtender
For our clients, timeXtender was a much better solution. It offered a more cost-effective solution, easier integration, and better customer support for our complex client needs. The timeXtender team worked with us throughout the process to make sure we could create a success story that was repeatable for our clients, and they proved great partners.
Read full review
Transpara
Most of these products serve as the master source for managing data, but they all seem to have their own focus for what kind of data and metrics they monitor, visualize and analyze. I think Visual KPI holds its own against the competition because it serves so many purposes for so many departments at your organization.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
  • Better documentation and governance.
  • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Transpara
  • Duration to realize the benefit is less
  • OpEx requirement is steady since system is very robust
  • Minimum to no training required for users; VisualKPI is very intuitive
Read full review
ScreenShots