IBM Planning Analytics vs. OneStream

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
OneStream is an enterprise finance platform that unifies financial and operational data, embeds AI for better decisions and productivity, and can extend to meet the evolving needs of businesses without adding technical debt. Presented as an operating system for modern Finance, it unifies core financial functions and empowering the CFO to become a critical driver of business strategy, innovation, and growth. It is a cloud-based platform that modernizes the Office of the CFO. The…
$0
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Free
$0
Basic
$12
per month billed annually
Basic
$15
per month
Standard
$32
per month billed annually
Professional
$39
per month billed annually
Standard
$39
per month
Professional
$49
per month
Enterprise
$83
per month billed annually
Enterprise
$99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalRequired
Additional DetailsThe solution is only for Enterprises. Pricing for software is based on number of total users and one user gets all software functionality. Implementation would be based on what business problem or problems the solution will be used to solve, such as financial consolidation and reporting or planning or account reconciliations, etc.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
If compared to Excel, it eliminates version control issues and manual consolidation, which saves time and reduces errors.
On the other hand, if we compared with Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics is more agile and user-friendly, especially with the Excel integration (PAx) and the …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics was far more robust and worked well with our existing tools and processes.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
The overall tool is robust and complete in its capabilities.
It has an edge over other competitors and state of art technology.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It is truly hard to compare both products. I like both products and would suggest choosing one but trying both. Some things are better through IBM Planning Analytics and some things are better through the IBM Analytics engine. Ultimately I believe that IBM Planning Analytics …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
instead several, manual maintained excel spreadsheets, we have now implemented a save repeatable process to get data in and out to the users
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We chose IBM Planning Analytics because we find that it still uniquely positions with OLAP engine
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is my primary focus
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM watsonx.ai and IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In our organization, we chose IBM Planning Analytics because, in our opinion, IBM Planning Analytics has more features
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics flexibility is what makes it stand out between the others. Generally in other platforms you are restricted to predefined flows. Although it sounds good in the beginning, when you start using those systems you face some challenges when trying to adapt new …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning is really tough to set up and use as a fresher. So I have always faced difficulties helping new joinees to set up and use it. But with IBM Planning Analytics, it is more straightforward and easier to use with a good interface.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We have been using IBM Planning Analytics and haven't explored other products that could cover our business needs.
OneStream
Chose OneStream
Specifically talking with OneStream is very useful and considering easy to access more standardized and help to easy to navigate. Most common is user friendly and best financial planning tool which I ever seen! Compare with other tools OneStream provide best excel integration …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is a superior product compared to our previous legacy system. Would highly recommend for finance teams.
Chose OneStream
OneStream appears to be the best-in-class solution. Still, SAP Analytics Cloud integrates so seamlessly with SAP that it's tough to justify going "out of the family" when you're already deeply integrated with SAP.
Chose OneStream
For me, the choice for OneStream is due to the amount that can be configured and pre-configured which allows us to create standard and reusable content. This speeds up our service delivery.
Chose OneStream
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just …
Chose OneStream
Compared to some of the options we researched, OneStream is a much more modern product in the way it combines the different capabilities of intense calculations, highly customizable dashboards, great narrative reporting as well as the much loved Excel plug-in capability. We …
Chose OneStream
The performance gains with OneStream alone are a reason to switch from Oracle, but the versatility of the application is the icing on the cake. Versatility is added by the additional dimensions, the customizable dashboards where you can plan for Revenue and Expenses, People …
Chose OneStream
OneStream gave me my life back. Working in outdated Essbase for closing the books & Forecasting it would take us 10-12 days working 12 - 16 hour days. 2020 we went to OneStream. I have not worked a weekend since, closing and forecasting went to 5-7 days working 8-9 hours a …
Chose OneStream
IBM Analytics seemed quite competitive. OneStream was selected because it has the consolidation and planning functionalities in the same cube. Overall cost for implementation and use were lower.
Lucanet and Anaplan seemed to have less flexibility to adapt the planning …
Chose OneStream
OneStream had a lot more capabilities as an all rounder tool that could leverage Actuals, forecast planning plus the other features like Tax and Transaction matching. OneStream also offer a Marketplace where a lot of bolt on modules are available for free with only some …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is the only one that seamlessly integrates close/consolidation with budget and planning in one tool. It integrates easily with ERPs and supports full financial statement AND management reporting
Chose OneStream
OneStream offers a comprehensive toolset to facilitate most modeling requirements. Our primary focus for selecting onestream was to facilitate a fast, robust and fully auditable consolidation tool that would meet our growing business requirements. OneStream has delivered on all …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is able to integrate faster and has a broader scope of newer technologies which makes it interact with other systems much more efficiently and seamlessly.
Chose OneStream
OneStream combines functionality that is normally spread over multiple solutions with other vendors, and provides an integration that previously could only be achieved via complicated technical structures to integrate and combine solutions for actual reporting and planning on …
Chose OneStream
OneStream single unified platform capabilities are outstanding. The flexibility around OneStream has allowed us to mold OneStream into our business model, whereas, I felt SAP forced us into their model. As an analyst, the reporting capabilities are my bread and butter and they …
Chose OneStream
Better GUI, faster, easier to maintain/administer.
Chose OneStream
I think HFM is very good at consolidation as well, but it is less flexible, not a platform, not as modern (look-and-feel), not as fast. In my opinion, OneStream stands out in the platform thinking. You have one licence which you can use for consolidation, tax, FP&A and even ESG …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is still being further developed and improved. Their marketplace provides some nice pre-built solutions. These are not as common with competitors. OneStream has a helpdesk that customers can reach out to instead of going through a middle man like consultants or …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is quite updated comparing with BPC. It has instant updates and it has more features like quick view, cubeview, dashboards, BI, Task scheduler. It's good for businesses to use it with a wide range of options to make their business decisions in short times. OneStream …
Chose OneStream
Achieve business expectations compared to other competitors
customized WFs based on requirements
BRs to meet end result
Chose OneStream
OneStream is the overall clear winner against HFM. There are a few things HFM does better (a couple things in Smart View), but it just doesn't have as much capability. The single, integrated platform that OneStream is provides a massive upgrade from HFM.
Chose OneStream
Hyperion HFM was a previous market leader in the EPM space but the OneStream FX platofrm far surpasses its offerings from Dashboarding, Workflow, Planning and forecasting all in one platform which under Hyperion was bundled in separate modules.
Chose OneStream
better system design and integration of tools
Chose OneStream
To sum it up, OneStream is like the Oracle Hyperion suite having a baby and feeding it steroids. It is leagues ahead.

OneStream is a one stop shop with one licence needed. There is no need to buy a licence for each product used like Hyperion.
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
OneStream
6.4
Ratings
17% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.30 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.30 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.70 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
OneStream
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Drill-down analysis7.90 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.80 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
OneStream
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Publish to Web7.90 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report Versioning8.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.90 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.3
Ratings
2% below category average
OneStream
6.4
Ratings
15% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.70 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.80 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.80 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.8
Ratings
7% below category average
OneStream
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.40 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
OneStream
6.7
Ratings
11% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Mobile Application6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile5.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
OneStream
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Long-term financial planning8.30 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.70 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Forecasting9.30 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Management reporting8.30 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
OneStream
8.6
Ratings
10% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.20 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.20 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.80 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.80 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
6% above category average
OneStream
8.4
Ratings
6% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.40 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.20 Ratings7.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.80 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
OneStream
7.2
Ratings
11% below category average
Personalized dashboards8.90 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.90 Ratings6.70 Ratings
KPIs8.20 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.30 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.30 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
OneStream
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Flat file integration8.40 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Excel data integration9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsOneStream
Likelihood to Recommend
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
OneStream is best suited for medium to large companies that find themselves doing a wide variety of manual processes during their financial close cycle will get the most benefit. That does mean a lot of change so there has to be very intentional communication around change management in order to get the buy in that is necessary for success.
Read full review
Pros
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
  • Consolidation engine is powerful, we have around 500 entities translating from multiple source currencies into a common currency at good speed.
  • We leverage the Flash and Quarterly forecast providing users with pre seeded data so they only need to make tweaks rather then filling in a lot of manual forms.
  • We use Transaction matching for processing a lot of intercompany matching invoices from the ERP systems which helps end users a lot. Data is fed in from source ERPS and TXM generates the auto matches based on criteria provided.
  • We have a custom Tax module which we use to pull in tax entries from the consolidation side and this gives the Tax teams starting position for their tax calculations and enables them to also do a quarterly forecast estimate.
  • OneStream has great dashboarding capabilities for a whole range of use cases from charts and graphs, to drill-back data to running even steps that users can execute without having access to the source code/rules in the background!
Read full review
Cons
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
  • Provide some more prebuilt dashboards that serve as reference examples for specific topics, to allow users to gain an idea of all that is possible
  • Provide some clear cut explanations to explain some of the standard concepts, to allow companies that start their implementation to gain a quick understanding of how things work
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Currently we are using OneStream with people 80 - 100 to load the PL, BS , Forecast budget and People Planning. OneStream give us more visibility on trend and way forward thinking. Thanks to OneStream for the tool which helps the business in growing way. Thinking of innovation OneStream is right path.
Read full review
Usability
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Overall usability as an end-user is very easy. There are more people in the system getting information now than the prior platform used. People are gathering their information quicker as well. From an administrator standpoint, there are fewer glitches and issues than the prior platform. This is very good.
Read full review
Support Rating
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
OneStream support is focused on the infrastructure. Which means mainly when there issues with accessing to the system, they will be able to help. When the question is to much leaning towards functional it really becomes billable. The other issue is that the response time is not optimal. There is a lot of pingpong of messages and the time between the message can sometimes be long. Sometimes this result into a simple ticket to be taking days before it is closed.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
onestream offers a range of training. I have attended a number of trainings. During the trainings a vast amount of information is discussed. The trainings also include exercises. The speed of the training is pretty high. When reviewing the training material afterwards, I found that the material is not complete as reference as it relies also very much on the verbal explanation and elaboration.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just scratching a surface of what the system capabilities are.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
  • Customers have moved from multiple EPM systems as well as multiple EPM applications to OneStream.
  • Their ROI has been quite high as lesser admins are required, no need to move data back & forth, no need for an additional dashboarding / BI tool, once a user is on OneStream can leverage it for more than 50+ use cases at no additional license cost.
  • Automation, direct integration, scheduling, complex calculation capabilities, all help to further improve ROI and free up the time for the team to do value-adding tasks.
  • Last but not the least is the confidence on the numbers is much higher.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

OneStream Screenshots

Screenshot of OneStream DashboardScreenshot of Profitability AnalysisScreenshot of Product and Customer ProfitabilityScreenshot of Account ReconciliationsScreenshot of Cash PlanningScreenshot of Financial Signaling