IBM Planning Analytics
October 15, 2025
IBM Planning Analytics

Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Planning Analytics
We use it to build dimensions for our product SKUs, locations within our warehouse, customer, shipping lanes etc. We can track inventory turns, cost by SKUs and inbound vs outbound costs. It helps to feed data into our ERP, as shock levels change and shipments go out. We can also create scenarios to hand 3PL fluctuations in demand and shipping volumes.
Pros
- Driver based and rolling forecasts.
- Near real time data updates.
- Multidimensional modeling.
- Planning scenarios.
Cons
- Steep learning curve, so making it more user friendly.
- Degraded performance for large or complex models.
- Cost for licensing, integration and ongoing maintenance.
- Limited reporting and integration flexibilities.
- Overhead cost is a negative
- User friendliness is a negative
- Inventory optimization is a positive
- Capacity planning is a positive
- Costing & margin analysis is a positive
- Order & demand forecasting is a positive
- What if planning for disruptions is a positive
- Performance monitoring & continuous improvements is a positive
- Financial & operational alignment is a positive
- Handing large or complex models is a negative
Advanced forecasting and sharing data externally. Integration options to deploy on prem or cloud. Dashboarding to track scorecards and KPIs. Automation of routine tasks and data consolidation. Excel integration. Near real time data updates. Ability to create and manage rolling forecasts. Capability to create what if scenarios for planning purposes. Lastly the in memory of the OLAP.
Test scenarios in system. This is critical for our 3PL to handle fluctuations in demand or shipping volumes. Also when delays happen we can see the impact on inventory, labor and margins. For our Manufactuing side we can monitor raw material price changes, production schedule shifts and capacity constraints. So the what if scenario planning is a powerful tool for us.
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Do you think IBM Planning Analytics delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with IBM Planning Analytics's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Planning Analytics live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of IBM Planning Analytics go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy IBM Planning Analytics again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation