Likelihood to Recommend Due to its reliability, it is well-suited for mission-critical applications. It is also well suited for running multiple applications on a single server and fully utilizing the server's full capacity. However, it is not well suited for servers that require dedicated IO resources.
Read full review SCloud UHost offers scalable and reliable cloud compute instances with diverse configurations for varied application needs that ensures optimal performance. Its consistent speed and minimal downtime enhance overall reliability, contributing to uninterrupted business operations. SCloud UHost's seamless integration with SCloud services streamlines our cloud ecosystem for operational efficiency. SCloud UHost is less suited for small workloads if you wish to maximise per dollar spent. For smaller workloads, use
SCloud ULightHost instead.
Read full review Pros It is easy to segregate test environment with production environment security and compliance IBM server are scalable with - with increase in data it can dynamically allocate the resources with saves the company cost it is very convenient to use with help of its hardware management console and integrated virtualization manager. The best part it , it support our legacy system. Read full review Good pricing Customer Support Available Regions Read full review Cons Having a wider selection of software to work with would be welcome. Training and education is daunting at first and could be simplified. Much of the automation is wonderful after it is set up but getting started has a steep learning curve. Read full review Likelihood to Renew At the moment we are 100% satisfied with the performance and our support team is well used to the process involved. So unless we have some major issues in adopting, we are sure to be with IBM itself.
Read full review Usability Power Systems Virtual Server on IBM Cloud for IBMi's overall usability is good, but it can be difficult for new users, some learning is needed, but there are tonns of online documentation.
Read full review Reliability and Availability Very easy to use.
Read full review Performance Easy to use.
Read full review Support Rating As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
Read full review Implementation Rating It is economic.
Read full review Alternatives Considered They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
Read full review Both Azure and Oracle offer some sort of lock in, either by the initial discounts or software. What is truly locked in are our data and we really thought carefully from day one as we are a corporate. Even in thinking of going multi-cloud, we are afraid of big vendors like them. We came across SCloud UHost in an event and proceeded to try and never regretted onwards. Good job to the SCloud UHost team and their management for such great products at competitive prices.
Read full review Scalability It is efficient.
Read full review Return on Investment We have had a return on investment of 30%. There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform. Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive. Read full review Time to Market 10-15% faster Spending on compute 15-25% lower Read full review ScreenShots