TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Storage Ceph vs. StarWind Virtual SAN vs. VMware vSAN

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Storage Ceph

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM® Storage Ceph® is a software-defined storage platform that consolidates block, file and object storage to help organizations eliminate data silos and deliver a cloud-like experience while retaining the cost benefits and data sovereignty advantages of on-premises IT.N/A

    StarWind Virtual SAN

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AStarWind Virtual SAN is software-defined storage for efficient storage and backup.N/A

    VMware vSAN

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AVMware vSAN is an enterprise-class storage virtualization software that provides a simple path to hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) and multi cloud. VMware vSAN is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Storage CephStarWind Virtual SANVMware vSAN
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Storage CephStarWind Virtual SANVMware vSAN
    Free Trial
    NoYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Storage CephStarWind Virtual SANVMware vSAN
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM Storage Ceph
    VSAN (Virtual SAN) and Ceph are both software-defined storage solutions, but they have some key differences in terms of their architecture and capabilities.VSAN is a software-defined storage solution that is built into the VMware vSphere hypervisor. It allows organizations to …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Storage Ceph
    Red Hat Ceph storage is most comparable with VMware Virtual SAN which we currently use in production. It had about the same default resiliency although we had far more customization options with Ceph albeit more difficult to configure. VMware Virtual SAN is such an expensive …
    Incentivized
    StarWind
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    StarWind Virtual SAN Applicance is available in a hyperconverged scenario, it means you can run it on existing virtual machines and it does the backup against each other by synchronizing the data store with each other. Vmware does not have this type of hyperconvergent approach. …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    VMware vSAN requires 3 physical hosts or 2 and a witness, and this was not practical for our situation as we are SMB. StarWind allows us to continue our 2-host virtualization setup and keep all our redundancy and performance.
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    StarWind Virtual SAN is generally less expensive than VMware vSAN, especially when it comes to licensing costs. StarWind Virtual SAN is licensed per node, whereas VMware vSAN requires a license for each CPU core in each node. This can make VMware vSAN significantly more …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    We have not used VMware vSAN as much as StarWind but cost is better with StarWind and also support
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    We were initially utilizing HPE Lefthand OS as a virtual SAN which was then set to EOL. We evaluated a number of solutions including VMware vSAN and settled on StarWind. StarWind provided a better value, easier and more intuitive interface, and wasn't wizard driven.
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    When it comes to virtual storage solutions, there are a few options to choose from including StarWind Virtual SAN, VMware vSAN, and TrueNAS. I've evaluated each of these solutions and found that StarWind Virtual SAN stacks up well against the competition.
    For me, the deciding …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    These products are awesome, but not cost-effective for me. VMware vSAN integrates like a glove if you are running fully VMware environment, not other hypervisors. ONTAP Select is awesome, like a real cabinet, but licensing is a bit complex, and expensive. in both cases in a …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    They do everything VMware vSAN can do for what I would say 99% of people need and more for a much cheaper price!
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    VMware vSAN did not support 2-node clusters and was more expensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    StarWind in our experience has a better pricing service and customer support. Additionally, only 2 host machines are required to setup the VSAN compared to 3 machines minimum recommended by VMware vSAN. This allowed us to save money on the licensing costs,hardware costs, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    Much more affordable, perpetual license
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    Better functionality, less complexity, cost effective
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    StarWind Virtual SAN is easier to setup and use, and less expensive. It also has the flexibility of working with Hyper-V or vSphere. StarWind Virtual SAN as a company is also much easier to work with.
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    HPE and Dell solutions were just too expensive for our budget. HPE's solution lacked performance. Dell's solution is plagued by bad reviews which told stories of broken patching procedures and terrible support experiences. The only company who offered me a trial of their …
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    We selected starwind vsan instead of vmware because of the integrated support they provide for the hardware and the software
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    We have found the solution surprisingly simple to use. The management console allows us to monitor the solution and we have configured email alerts to alert us about critical issues. These alerts have been proven
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    StarWind Virtual SAN is the most flexible and reliable system I tested. Although there are other good systems in the market this is the most flexible allowing integration with many Hypervisors
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    On performance vs cost StarWind fills a spot.
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    It came down to two things! First a solution that would fit our budget AND having top notch support handling install/implementation and resolution of issues!
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    I selected "Windows Server" since I couldn't find S2D in the list... S2D just sucks overall. Crap UI. Crap CLI. Megacrap documentation. VMware is very expensive...
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    the features that StarWind offer, especially in a ROBO scenario, are the same as all the other competitor but with a fraction of the cost
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    Ease of use, simplicity of set up and deployment, licensing cost and structure, and hardware freedom. When comparing to other big name solutions there is clearly a advantage from a cost and simplicity perspective while not sacrificing performance and reliability.
    Incentivized
    Chose StarWind Virtual SAN
    The biggest difference in my opinion between these two is the level of integration that VMWare's solution provides. It's a purpose-built solution for their environment so it will enjoy tighter integration across their product stack. Because StarWind is platform-agnostic it's …
    Incentivized
    VMware by Broadcom
    Chose VMware vSAN
    Upgrades and maintenance are little difficult in other solutions available. Also, VMware vSAN offers a vast range of features optimizing the CPU and memory to great extent resulting in faster performance . Performance is enhanced with VMware vSAN and support of vSAN is also …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    123 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    14 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    123 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    123 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    14 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    116 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    117 Answers
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Storage CephStarWind Virtual SANVMware vSAN
    Small Businesses
    StarWind Virtual SAN
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    StarWind Virtual SAN
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Storage Scale
    Score9.9 out of 10
    IBM Storage Scale
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Storage CephStarWind Virtual SANVMware vSAN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (6 ratings)
    9.5
    (163 ratings)
    10.0
    (17 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (14 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (33 ratings)
    9.2
    (4 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (119 ratings)
    7.5
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Storage CephStarWind Virtual SANVMware vSAN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Large scale data storage: Red Hat Ceph Storage is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data. It's well suited for organizations that need to store and manage large amounts of data, such as backups, images, videos, and other types of multimedia content.Cloud-based deployments: Red Hat Ceph Storage can provide object storage services for cloud-based applications such as SaaS and PaaS offerings. It is well suited for organizations that are looking to build their own cloud storage infrastructure or to use it as a storage backend for their cloud-based applications.High-performance computing: Red Hat Ceph Storage can be used to provide storage for high-performance computing (HPC) applications, such as scientific simulations and other types of compute-intensive workloads. It's well suited for organizations that need to store
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    StarWind
    For remote locations, where communications are limited and cloud services are difficult to obtain, on-premises servers are the only solution. Hardware solutions require spares in storage for redundancy and are more expensive than software solutions. If communications and cloud computing are highly available, then solutions such as StarWnd Virtual SAN would not be needed.
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    The product is a must for enterprise & SMB segments as this gives a good value for money and the licensing policy is very well defined and cost effective for the feature set it provides. This is very well suited for organization which have multiple brand storage systems and would like to consolidate them all together, thus providing a huge storage capacity for the organizations data growth. The product becomes less appropriate in organization where they have single storage platform as the service provider would have the ability to consilidate all the storage systems. Hence this products may be under utilized.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Highly resilient, almost every time we attempted to destroy the cluster it was able to recover from a failure. It struggled to when the nodes where down to about 30%(3 replicas on 10 nodes)
    • The cache tiering feature of Ceph is especially nice. We attached solid state disks and assigned them as the cache tier. Our sio benchmarks beat the our Netapp when we benchmarked it years ago (no traffic, clean disks) by a very wide margin.
    • Ceph effectively allows the admin to control the entire stack from top to bottom instead of being tied to any one storage vendor. The cluster can be decentralized and replicated across data centers if necessary although we didn't try that feature ourselves, it gave us some ideas for a disaster recovery solution. We really liked the idea that since we control the hardware and the software, we have infinite upgradability with off the shelf parts which is exactly what it was built for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    StarWind
    • the StarWind Virtual SAN allows us to use Starwind Management Console to confirm health of the sync
    • The High Available nature of the deployment means we can fail over VMs without end users noticing any downtime
    • Their support is proactive alerting when firmware updates are needed (including iDRAC firmware) or when there are any warnings in the event logs, and schedule a time to remediate the issue with you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • VMware runs VSAN certification programs to make sure the OEM sells validated nodes. It helps customers to select appropriate certified ready nodes like Lenovo ThinkAgile VX which comes factory configured and easy to set up.
    • Hyperconverged solutions reduce real estate space and networking costs when compare with shared storage. The host overhead also less.
    • Supports All-Flash (SATA and NVMe SSDs) and Hybrid vSAN with HDD and SSD. So customers can choose cost-effective solutions appropriate to their workloads.
    • Supports different storage policies, RAID and duplication, and compression features and it makes a complete storage solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • GUI based mainetenence should be developed
    • Unable to detect storage latencies
    • VM to disk mapping should be visible so as to save some critical applications data in case of HDD failures
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    StarWind
    • Complexity: StarWind Virtual SAN can be complex to set up and manage, especially for organizations with limited IT resources
    • Limited protocol support: StarWind Virtual SAN supports a limited number of protocols, primarily iSCSI and SMB3
    • Limited scalability for storage-only deployments: In storage-only deployments, StarWind Virtual SAN has a limit of 32 nodes per cluster
    • Lack of reporting and analytics: StarWind Virtual SAN has limited reporting and analytics capabilities, which can make it difficult to monitor and troubleshoot performance issues
    • Limited backup and recovery options: While StarWind Virtual SAN provides some basic backup and recovery options, it lacks advanced features such as snapshot management, backup scheduling, and offsite replication
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • We were a fairly early adopter of VMware vSAN and as such experienced several growing pains.
    • We experienced a few bugs that took a few software versions upgrades to go mostly away.
    • The biggest issue we had overall was with host drivers. Even with vSAN ready node compatible hosts, you have to be very careful that the drivers for NIC and RAID controllers are right.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    StarWind Virtual SAN is a great solution and is now an integral part of our network of servers. The product is superb and the support has been amazing. It's perfect for our organisation and we won't be looking to come away from it any time soon!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    Very easy to use and manage from an IT standpoint. The user interface is well laid out, provides access to the underlying hardware configurations, and allows customization of storage volumes from each cluster node in your environment. Can provide differing levels of access, so team member access can be set up based on roles.
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    Deploying and configuring VSAN is a relatively simple process for people that are already used to working in virtual environments, primarily for those that are familiar with vSphere. The compatibility of those two products is amazing. You shouldn't really encounter any issues and if you do, you surely did something wrong.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    The solution has been tested under constant usage for 5 years now and there (knock on wood) has yet be an outage. There were instances if human error during the operation and the StarWind reliably intervened, either through a synchronization or reporting of a degredation of interfaces, e.g. the heartbeat interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    The software delivered exceptional performance until now with very fast write and speed rates, around 900MB/s through a 10GBit connection on a virtualized fileserver. It meets our demands without any problems whatsoever and we are a very media heavy environment with TBs of raw data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    Their support team is dedicated to providing top-notch customer service and is always available to help with any questions or issues that may arise. Their expertise and responsiveness have proven invaluable in ensuring the smooth operation of our virtualized environment. With such excellent support, we feel confident in our ability to utilize this product to its fullest potential, and we highly recommend it to others.
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    Support is (as always forVMware) top notch and easy to work with. The majority of computer companies are outsourcing their tech staff, and it seems they do as well. But their guys know the product well and are quick to respond to your ticket (if the severity is right!).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    Overall the setup was easy, we did require some help from the technical support team but other than that, we followed all of StarWinds prerequisites and everything else just fell nicely into place with hardly any downtime. The downtime was only due to moving VMs from our previous cluster over to the new StarWind storage cluster.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    MongoDB offers better search ability compared to Red Hat Ceph Storage but it’s more optimized for large number of object while Red Hat Ceph Storage is preferred if you need to store binary data or large individual objects. To get acceptable search functionality you really need to compile Red Hat Ceph Storage with another database where the search metadata related to Red Hat Ceph Storage objects are stored.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    StarWind
    We have found the solution surprisingly simple to use. The management
    console allows us to monitor the solution and we have configured email
    alerts to alert us about critical issues. These alerts have been proven
    to work in an actual failure scenario, for example, when we had a memory
    issue with one of our servers that caused the entire server to crash.
    The management console also allows us to monitor the solution
    performance and provides us with access to system logs.
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    Our VMware solution is built in-house for the organization's private application, we don't want to put our data on cloud premises. Also, vSAN is a cost-effective solution for our environment. We have done the POC with both products to understand the Flexibility, Management, and cost. After the successful POC, we have chosen the VMware vSAN.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    StarWind
    The software is very scalable storage wise. The storage is provisioned through config files, which are created either through PowerShell scripts or the Management Console on the paid version. After that the storage is provisioned through iSCSI. In our case, in case of expansion, we would have to run the PowerShell scripts and do another full synchronization to update any remaining backup nodes, but the procedure is clear and even easier via Management Console, just expand the RAID array, punch the new capacity into the console and start the synchronization!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Ceph allows my customer to scale out very fast.
    • Ceph allows distributing storage objects through multiple server rooms.
    • Ceph is fault-taulerant, meaning the customer can lose a server room and would still be able to access the storage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    StarWind
    • It eliminates the need for expensive storage hardware and provides an affordable software-defined storage solution.
    • It allows organizations to use commodity hardware, reducing the dependency on proprietary hardware.
    • It ensures that data and applications are always available, reducing downtime and increasing productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • we have realized savings in the licensing compared to traditional storage (over $500,000 over the last 5 years)
    • we have realized ROI through efficiencies in our staff of approx $1MM (over the last 5 years)
    • also, positive impact on the time to value/speed of implementation allowed us to realize business objectives (Over $1MM of ROI)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    StarWind Virtual SAN Screenshots

    Screenshot of StarWind Management ConsoleScreenshot of StarWind Management ConsoleScreenshot of StarWind Virtual SANScreenshot of StarWind Virtual SAN