IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. Microsoft BI (MSBI)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.
$14
per month per user
Pricing
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Power BI Pro
$14
per month per user
Power BI Premium
$24
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson StudioMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Considered Both Products
IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
I wanted an environment that can support multiple users without any restrictions. Also, R-Studio does not provide a collaborative environment for multiple users. The Auto feature selection in the SPSS modeler is a good node in DSx which helps make statistical decisions on …
Microsoft BI (MSBI)

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Visualization10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.022 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.8
49 Ratings
18% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.942 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.749 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.947 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.8
49 Ratings
20% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.749 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.939 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.949 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.9
48 Ratings
19% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings9.940 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.943 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.924 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.9
48 Ratings
22% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.947 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.942 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.9
49 Ratings
15% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.946 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.943 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.946 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.928 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.8
39 Ratings
13% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.936 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.027 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings10.036 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.8
21 Ratings
24% above category average
REST API00 Ratings9.919 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings9.919 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings9.918 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings9.918 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings9.717 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.6 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(65 ratings)
9.9
(73 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.0
(25 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(2 ratings)
10.0
(15 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.9
(15 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
6.9
(3 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
9.6
(7 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft BI (MSBI)
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is well suited for Stream analytics, easy data integration, report creation and UI/UX designs (limited but what all available are great ones) Microsoft BI may be less appropriate for handling huge number of datasets and difficult queries. It may also be difficult for a company with heavy data.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Comparatively easy to use compared to other data analytics solutions, collaborating with other colleagues on data work is simple.
  • Using Visual Studio for database, ETL, reporting, and analytics development save time and money.
  • Transfer of data from one application to another via Excel and comparison of data attributes between applications
  • Dashboard functionality, as well as Python support, are available, allowing you to add additional charts and graphs.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The race to perfect gathering of Non-Traditional datasets is on-going; with Microsoft arguably not the leader of the pack in this category.
  • Licensing options for PowerBI visualizations may be a factor. I.e. if you need to implement B2C PowerBI visualizations, the cost is considerably high especially for startups.
  • Some clients are still resistant putting their data on the cloud, which restricts lots of functionality to Power BI.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Microsoft
The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Microsoft
The product has been reliable.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Microsoft
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
Microsoft
While support from Microsoft isn't necessarily always best of breed, you're also not paying the price for premium support that you would on other platforms. The strength of the stack is in the ecosystem that surrounds it. In contrast to other products, there are hundreds, even thousands of bloggers that post daily as well as vibrant user communities that surround the tool. I've had much better luck finding help with SQL Server related issues than I have with any other product, but that help doesn't always come directly from Microsoft.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Microsoft
This training was more directed toward what the product was capable of rather than actual programming.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Microsoft
I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Microsoft
We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Microsoft
We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
Microsoft
  • As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
  • However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.
Read full review
ScreenShots