TrustRadius

IBM Workload Automation vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Workload Automation
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Workload Automation (IBM Workload Scheduler, formerly Tivoli Workload Scheduler is IBM's IT workload automation offering.N/A
Trellix Cloud Workload Security
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Cloud Workload Security (formerly from McAfee) to give users a real-time view of running workloads through detecting workloads and pods. This product can integrate with both public and private cloud infrastructures.N/A
Pricing
IBM Workload AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Workload AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Workload AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Best Alternatives
IBM Workload AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Workload AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Workload AutomationTrellix Cloud Workload Security
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Suitable scenario: The McAfee Cloud Workload Security console has helped me a lot in saving physical resources. We no longer have to have a server and spend resources to maintain the console, everything is in the cloud. Unsuitable scenario: After the change to the cloud the McAfee Cloud Workload Security reduced many things that were made very easy when it was on a physical server. Active directory server integration with the console is a bit tricky. That should be improved and be somewhat more friendly when connecting to be able to migrate user machines.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
IBM
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Monitoring of detected threats
  • Checking the status of antivirus agents
  • Monitoring of antivirus software installed
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
IBM
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Improve integration with windows server active directory.
  • The monitoring of the implementation of missing components of the antivirus should be improved.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
We use McAfee Endpoint Security on user PCs and I must say that it is an excellent antivirus. The alerts we have had have been resolved without any problem. I totally recommend it.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Improved resource savings in terms of physical infrastructure.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots