ID.me vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ID.me
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
ID.me is a digital identity network that aims to simplify the user's indication verification experience.N/A
Microsoft Entra External ID
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Entra External ID (formerly Azure Active Directory B2C, or alternately, Azure Active Directory External Identities) provides business-to-customer identity as a service. Customers can use their preferred social, enterprise, or local account identities to get single sign-on access to applications and APIs.
$0
per month per active users
Pricing
ID.meMicrosoft Entra External ID
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Premium P1 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
$0.00325
per month per active users
Premium P2 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
$0.01625
per month per active users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ID.meMicrosoft Entra External ID
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—A flat fee of $0.03 is billed for each SMS/Phone-based multi-factor authentication attempt.
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
ID.meMicrosoft Entra External ID
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Dashlane Password Manager
Dashlane Password Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ID.meMicrosoft Entra External ID
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(6 ratings)
8.8
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
ID.meMicrosoft Entra External ID
Likelihood to Recommend
ID.me
ID.me is well suited for our business to verify customers to provide a discount due to their top-notch software which is easy for our customers to use and is quick. Beyond customer experience, it has massive business benefits as it saves us a lot of time and money to use their white-glove software vs doing it ourselves as we did in the past using paper documents and our own people.
Read full review
Microsoft
It is not easy to calculate the actual ROI due to the difficult quantification of all factors, but it certainly contributed a lot in protecting, monitoring and controlling access to our system. It also made it much easier to detect vulnerable external users with simple and "easy to hack" passwords they use on multiple apps.
Read full review
Pros
ID.me
  • Scalable audience size
  • Easy integration with Shopify
  • Secure customer verification
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Single sign-on simplifies access to your apps from anywhere
  • Strong authentication for your customers using their preferred identity provider.
  • Integrating with social accounts such as Facebook or Google+
Read full review
Cons
ID.me
  • Be able to verify people without them providing any documentation by getting access to needed databases where that information is stored.
  • Be conscious that people do not like to provide their SS#.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Troubleshooting diagnostic logs effectively requires VS Code
  • Group and role management requires additional effort
  • The programming model (XML) could use some developer experience love
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ID.me
We didn't evaluate any others. At the time ID.me had the largest customer base and I believe that still holds true.
Read full review
Microsoft
Each one of these alternatives has pros and cons. PingOne from Ping Identity states they "help deliver the secure and seamless customer experience to win battles for customer acquisition, retention, revenue, loyalty, and trust." While that may be the case, they did not fit our needs. We have a complex system and it did not seem to fit into our business.
Read full review
Return on Investment
ID.me
  • Raises AOV for select segments
  • Brings new customers to our store
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Having monthly active users billing was cost-effective.
  • Helped with the IT support that was already managing the Azure platform of the company; this helped to manage the costs better and optimize them.
Read full review
ScreenShots