IDnow vs. Salesforce Identity

It's a good way to get up and running with a KYC process, albeit a bit clunky once set up. I would not recommend IDnow to an enterprise-level company because I think it's more conducive to a smaller, mid-sized business more so than a larger organization looking for all the bells and whistles.

Incentivized

Salesforce Identity is well suited and I'm on the street visiting and I have to access a customer's account and I need to access multiple systems at the same time to get a lot of information. When I have to compare information on 2 or more different systems and I need it all connected at the same time.

Incentivized

• Regulatory requirements.
• AML requirements.

Incentivized

• SFI, allows you to connect and manage all your applications in one easy to use interface.
• It has the ability to use many different authentication standards to fit all the different needs of the applications.
• If the standard isn't supported it has the flexibility to create your own custom solution.

Incentivized

• Customer service.
• Less buggy identification process.
• Wait time for support.

Incentivized

• Can't think of any other than pricing.

Incentivized

One system completes the other. I use Salesforce Identity to enter Salesforce CMS. All my company's client portfolios are in SF CMS. I use the Salesforce Identity and the Salesforce CMS every day, all the time.

Incentivized

• Positive: higher KYC success rates.
• Positive: less fear over regulatory requirements.
• Negative: lots of time and effort debugging from time to time.

Incentivized

• The biggest return is on the auditing and ease of use for the users.

Incentivized