IFS Applications vs. Brassring

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Brassring
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Features
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files5.83 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
API for custom integration8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Accounts payable9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Pricing8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management9.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization8.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management8.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Production Process Design9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Forecasting8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Brassring
7.5
11 Ratings
6% below category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings7.711 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings7.410 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.711 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings7.410 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings8.310 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings7.18 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings7.49 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(5 ratings)
8.3
(30 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(12 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(4 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
1.8
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.6
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsBrassring
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • It supports the web version in most later versions.
  • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
  • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
  • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
  • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
  • Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
  • Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
  • Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
  • BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
  • Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IFS
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
Read full review
Usability
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
Read full review
Performance
IFS
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
Just slow for what we are doing here
Read full review
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IFS
No answers on this topic
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
We purchased an out of the box solution and that worked well for us.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IFS
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated
Read full review
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc
  • Kenexa has assisted us in identifying top talent within our target market of applicants.
  • Kenexa may exclude potentially good associates that don't test well.
  • Kenexa clearly defines specific categories and general notes for training, development, & coaching of associates on areas of opportunity.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of