IFS Applications vs. MIP Fund Accounting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
MIP Fund Accounting™ is a configurable fund accounting solution. The solution includes functionality for fund accounting, procurement, budgeting, payroll, human resources, timekeeping, fixed asset management, grant management, and dashboards for nonprofits and government agencies.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Features
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.3
3 Ratings
52% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files5.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
API for custom integration8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Accounts payable9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
12% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management9.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Pricing8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing8.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
25% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization8.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management8.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.23 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
11% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Production Process Design9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
21% above category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Forecasting8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Online
Score 8.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Sage Intacct
Sage Intacct
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(5 ratings)
9.2
(435 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(132 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(4 ratings)
8.6
(103 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(15 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(92 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(100 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(9 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(28 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(8 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(14 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(15 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(13 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(13 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsMIP Fund Accounting
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Momentive Software
MIP Fund Accounting works very well for general fundraising. The form creation process is easy and allows you to set parameters and add fees, quantities, images, etc. This process is smooth on the customer (forward-facing) side as well. Reports are generated once the transactions have gone through, making tracking and reconciliation with accounting easy.
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • It supports the web version in most later versions.
  • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
  • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
  • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
  • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
Read full review
Momentive Software
  • Easy to obtain check register for select periods
  • Easy to do bank reconciliations
  • Easy to log in for remote work, for anywhere I need to access it from!
  • Easy to pull vendor, chart of accounts and other pertinent information, also easy to add information to those sections.
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
Read full review
Momentive Software
  • With the payroll process, if there is an error in sending the stubs through email, there is no option to resend without a restore. That really needs to change.
  • Being able to void encumbrance at the same time as a PO would be an incredible time saver.
  • When processing W2 the system deletes info.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
I give MIP a 10 because Our organization use MIP Fund Accounting ever since I've been there and that's been for over 20 plus years for all of our accounting and payroll. MIP has stayed on the cutting edge of technology, ever evolving to meet the needs of the times, especially post pandemic, while many are working remotely! MIP support staff are very knowledgeable and efficient. Even new users can get up to speed quickly with MIP Fund Accounting.
Read full review
Usability
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Momentive Software
I have used this system for about 12 years now and I still learning how to use it. It always surprises me how there is another report to learn to achieve my data reporting goals. It is great to have a system that you have used long enough to feel comfortable with but also a system that allows you to learn new ways to report and enter data into the system
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
I have rarely encountered any issues accessing MIP Fund Accounting over the years. On the rare occasions when availability was interrupted, the reasons were always found in-house when using the on-premises version. Since we have migrated to the MIP cloud, we have had no issues with availability. Any maintenance or updates are always communicated to us and are usually done outside of business hours.
Read full review
Performance
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
We have 18 programs and the CFO has the ability through MIP Fund Accounting to generate separate and/or collective reporting for those programs. Each program has its own grant or funding source. Each has its own reporting guidelines that must be met so the ability to run reporting separately or collectively is a plus.
Read full review
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Momentive Software
I have not reached out to MIP for technical support; however, their website offers great help resources so I can solve an issue on my own. Another team member reached out to MIP for support and was helped quickly. The transition process took longer than expected due to a lag in communication.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
There are no specifics on what happens if you make one choice or another to know which is the best selection. This is true for JVs and AP. In training we were not given specifics of what happens when one possibility is selected over another.
Read full review
Online Training
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
Denise O'Malley provided training for the HR module when we added it to our system. Denise also gave us a demo of the EWS module which we were able to see that it would not meet our needs. She was very kind about and understanding regarding the functions we needed with a time clock system.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
Don't waste your time with MIP. There are plenty of other softwares out there that will do the job better. Do your homework. Get references from actual users. Make sure that what you choose will truly integrate. Make sure that there is local support. Get training. You will be glad that you passed this one by. Trust me.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IFS
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Read full review
Momentive Software
I've utilized other ERP accounting software like Infor, NetSuite, and MS Dynamics, to name a few. MIP Fund Accounting offers flexibility and room for growth while not being overly heavy on your team to maintain it. And, we're now learning more about the add-on's and more advanced capabilities to leverage with our team.
Read full review
Scalability
IFS
No answers on this topic
Momentive Software
The flexibility to create certain features are helpful and are designed to be easier on MIP Accounting Cloud. It has been easier than the MIP Accounting classic version. I may have not fully utilized the software to deploy across multiple departments other than generating revenue reports or expenses. As well as developing budget worksheets for our departments. Which are great as it is, but have not gone farther than that.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
Momentive Software
  • We converted to the cloud version a few years ago to reduce our dependency on a dedicated internal IT server which needed to be replaced. The cost of the product switched to a monthly fee which increased cost somewhat but probably is matched with IT savings over time in doing upgrades.
  • We have an efficient team of two people doing the transactional work, so we don't really have much incentive to further automate our processes. And with the turnover in the CFO position we have had, has helped us maintain consistency in our processing.
  • Once I learned how to memorize and recall transactions it was a huge timesaver and increased the accuracy and consistency of our entry.
  • The cost of training is sometimes prohibitive. Example is my accounting clerk MIGHT benefit from additional training but at about $200 for a lot of the courses, it is more than we have budgeted.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

MIP Fund Accounting Screenshots

Screenshot of MIP Advance™ Dashboards with drilldownScreenshot of MIP™ Transactions WorkflowScreenshot of MIP DashboardsScreenshot of MIP DashboardsScreenshot of MIP Dashboard drilldownScreenshot of MIP Transactions