IFS Applications vs. Sage Fixed Assets

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
ScoreĀ 6.0Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturingā€¦N/A
Sage Fixed Assets
ScoreĀ 7.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
Sage Fixed Assets provides simplified fixed-asset tracking with comprehensive depreciation calculations, including over 300,000 U.S. and Canadian regulations for businesses, governments and nonprofits.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
151% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Pay calculation1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
152% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
API for custom integration1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.5
2 Ratings
39% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.3
2 Ratings
137% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Dashboards2.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.4
2 Ratings
17% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Accounts payable8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.3
2 Ratings
59% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
154% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Pricing1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
152% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Billing Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
149% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.2
1 Ratings
141% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
147% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Risk Repository1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
31% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Production Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Sage Fixed Assets
-
Ratings
Forecasting5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
ScoreĀ 8.7Ā outĀ ofĀ 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
ScoreĀ 7.2Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
ScoreĀ 8.3Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
ScoreĀ 7.4Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
ScoreĀ 8.3Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(2 ratings)
2.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsSage Fixed Assets
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Sage
I believe that Sage is not suited well for our company because we are too large. To add new users we have to go into all 200+ companies and add their access individually. This is time-consuming and not a good way to manage access.
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
Sage
  • Central Repository.
  • Staying up to date on tax law changes.
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • The speed of bug fixes should be improved by the IFS after sales teams. We saw the difference of responsiveness prior to Go Live and after Go Live, with a change of teams. IFS France is working on that point, and strategically wants to innovate by acting now with two other third-party companies in early 2017, to improve the after sales experience for customers.
  • There is no license model between the full licenses, which gives access to all IFS features, and the light licenses, to get access to a specific module like expense sheet. As a consequence, you must acquire a full access license for one team working only with a dedicated module (e.g. general ledger). Maybe an intermediate type license would be welcome to balance the budget. IFS tries to make prices competitive but you have to consider full upgrades of the product too, where requiring full licenses can be hard on the budget.
  • When you have an Active Directory ecosystem with a trust relationship, users from domain B can't natively access IFS, even if AD sync is in place with domain A. It's important to improve that functionality because many companies have a merge and acquisition context, with SOX constraints sometimes, and avoiding maintaining contacts or local accounts simplifies SOX compliance, or to management of accounts within the company.
Read full review
Sage
  • Adding new users with multiple company access
  • Copying users
Read full review
Usability
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Sage
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Sage
Rather lackluster. Our account manager generally works with Sage's support team and oftentimes finds herself frustrated with a lack of understanding from the support team. Additionally, when IT is attempting to update the system (which from my understanding is a bear of epic complex proportions) they often times find themselves frustrated and at a loss for what needs done.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IFS
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartnerā€™s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Sage
[I believe that] Sage is nowhere near as good as Oracle. Oracle is easy to use and administer and the features are much better. The system is cloud-based so there are fewer issues with on-prem or virtual servers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
Sage
  • It is incredibly difficult to use and our business users generally do not look favorably on it.
  • It is relatively low cost, which is a nice feature and lends to quick ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of