IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Agentforce Field Service
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Field Service (formerly known as Field Service Lightning) is a customizable, mobile-friendly field service hub in Salesforce. It provides tools to manage work orders, scheduling, and a mobile workforce.
$600
per year per user
Pricing
IFS Applications
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Contractor
$50
per month (billed annually) per user
Contractor Plus
$75
per month (billed annually) per user
Dispatcher
$165
per month (billed annually) per user
Technician
$165
per month (billed annually) per user
Field Service Plus
$220
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Agentforce Field Service
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
Features
IFS Applications
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Salesforce Agentforce Field Service
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
We've demoed quite a few models, different companies. I know Salesforce has huge backing, but even so they're open to customization and solutions. Some of the competition, keep in mind for my industry, there's not a lot of options out there. We're not your typical Salesforce target market. I mean we're not really selling a lot. I mean, quite honestly, I don't even have a sales department because can't do all of the work that my current customers need me to do. So I don't need to go drum up new business. I just needed it for more of tracking and a work management solution. And in the construction, specifically utility construction, industry, there's not a lot of options, but it definitely was the best option for us.
Real Time Communication with back-office team When our nurses need anything by using mobile app they can reach out to our back office team to resolve their issues
Utilization of resources We can see the all the appointments view with the assigned representative in a single page so We can assign more appointments if any resources has any free slot it is just a drag and drop
It helps us to automate the process like delay or reach notification we can also route the appointments based on representative skill set, location and urgency of task
Our biggest complaint is the optimizer removes jobs from the schedule at times and they are hard to track down and if missed we may not have a tech show up at all for the customer.
Reporting off of Service Appointment history is challenging
Without having a developer adjust your views the amount of available fields can be overwhelming.
As of right now there is not a alternative that seems to offer all of the functionality with a vision of what is needed in the future. It is my belief that ClickSoftware will remain a leader in Mobile Workforce Management for a long time.
Within a week a scheduler can confidently navigate the program and from there they learn more niche tools but from the beginning they can hit the ground running. With different user views available the developers can narrow down what is needed based on your job role which has been invaluable.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Having a program that gives sales leaders a real time view was game changing. Time was always an issue because there wasn't always a sales leader available for closing sales. This has allowed for any sales leader to jump in and help make the sale without the need to do a warm transfer.
Overall the training was quite informative but did lack detail in some areas. It had all of the necessary content for an experience product user but didn't offer enough information for a new user to complete the training and then feel comfortable in real-world situations running or managing the software. I would recommend this course for anyone with at least 1 year of full-time exposure to the ClickSchedule product.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
I have added a few of the many Salesforce products we use. We also use HubSpot but they all have different functions so not really comparable as they are used for different things/ teams.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.