Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.
N/A
PerformancePro
Score8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
PerformancePro, designed by HR Performance Solutions, offers performance management and salary administration applications used by over 200,000 professionals. The vendor’s value proposition is that Performance Pro focuses heavily on product development which leads to more customization options than its competitors - ensuring the application works exactly how HR, employees, and executives want it to. The vendor also says Performance Pro is also the only application on the market that combines…
N/A
Pricing
Brassring
PerformancePro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Brassring
PerformancePro
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$950 per installation
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Brassring
PerformancePro
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Brassring and PerformancePro
Feature
Brassring
7.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
PerformancePro
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
7.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
7.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
7.111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
8.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Brassring and PerformancePro
Feature
Brassring
-
Ratings
PerformancePro
7.8
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Brassring and PerformancePro
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Useful in a wide range of performance management-based situations. Allows options like supervisor and peer feedback, as well as messaging and addition of notes to profiles and appraisals. Allows for uploading of external documents as well as creation PerformancePro-specific documents. We have used the system for both bi-annual and annual appraisals, and both cycles worked well. If your organization keeps performance-based records in another system or file structure, you might not utilize many of the options PerformancePro has, which could lead to it feeling underutilized.
Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
Interface - user interface could be updated to a more modern feel. Home screen (with widgets) feels somewhat cramped and widget displays could be more fully optimized.
Admin functions - Robust options, but the display of company edit pages is somewhat busy, and functions are sometimes buried under multiple pages of access.
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
In both chat and phone support, representatives have always been helpful and ready to offer assistance with any question or concern. Over the course of five years, there have been a few occasions when follow-up was assured but did not happen (or did not happen in a timely manner.) But much more frequently, support has been quick to follow-up and provide information as promised.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info