Measure moments that matter Insocial provides multiple ways of gathering feedback via different survey skins (surveys designed for any device) and invite methods across different channels (such as email, SMS, livechat, social media and even chatbots. With business rules and a connection to a CRM system, users can decide exactly when a customer should receive a survey from an organisation, to keep the frequency low and the quality of feedback high. Gain actionable…
N/A
Survicate
Score8.5 out of 10
N/A
Survicate is survey software for getting continuous customer insights at scale. It can be used to measure customer satisfaction (CSAT), track an organization's Net Promoter Score (NPS), get website feedback, or test product-market fit. Survicate supports any use case related to collecting and managing customer feedback. Survicate can be used to: • Create customized surveys and start getting customer feedback within minutes • Run surveys where they are needed: via email…
$99
per month 500 responses per month
Pricing
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
Survicate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Good
$99
per month 500 responses per month
Better
$149
per month 1000 responses per month
Best
$249
per month 2500 responses per month
Better Than The Rest
$269
per month
Better Than The Rest
$299
per month Custom pool of yearly responses
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
Survicate
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices are based on the amount of the different touchpoints, channels and locations you want to measure.
Additional fees apply for additional users and domains. The price of the Scale plan is negotiated individually and depends on the number of monthly responses needed and possible custom needs, including integrations.
More Pricing Information
Features
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
Survicate
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Insocial - Feedback Solutions and Survicate
Feature
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Survicate
9.7
5 Ratings
19% above category average
Themes
10.01 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
10.01 Ratings
9.83 Ratings
Survey templates
00 Ratings
9.83 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Insocial - Feedback Solutions and Survicate
Feature
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
8.3
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Survicate
9.1
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Changes to live survey
10.01 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Question design help
7.01 Ratings
8.93 Ratings
Multiple question types
8.01 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Insocial - Feedback Solutions and Survicate
Feature
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
10.0
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Survicate
9.5
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Survey logic flexibility
10.01 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Insocial - Feedback Solutions and Survicate
Feature
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
9.5
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Survicate
8.0
5 Ratings
1% below category average
Response tracking
9.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Data export
10.01 Ratings
9.65 Ratings
Standard reports
10.01 Ratings
8.65 Ratings
Custom reports
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
8.94 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Insocial - Feedback Solutions and Survicate
Feature
Insocial - Feedback Solutions
10.0
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Survicate
9.3
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Respondent restrictions
10.01 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Insocial - Feedback Solutions and Survicate
We are an international organization that operates in multiple geographies and for us the solution works quite well. Insocial - Feedback Solutions itself is still a relatively small organization, but that has actually not been an issue at all. They're very flexible and helpful as a supplier. There was a close cultural fit between our 2 organizations, which made it into a success. If you are looking for a solution and partner to capture recurring customer sentiment and measure things like NPS, NLS, CSAT, CES and open feedback by using short and concise surveys that also drill down on those scores Insocial - Feedback Solutions can be a great fit.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Survicate is well suited for very basic intercept polls and is less suited for more complex surveying tasks (e.g., anything more than basic skip-logic or surveying niche cohorts) and longitudinal surveying (e.g., comparing responses from the same or similar cohorts year over year).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Survey creation could be easier, although as a customer I did not really feel this pain as our CSM [...] fully unburdoned us
I had some comments about the closed loop feedback process and email notification look&feel, however they've already addressed this feedback in the last year with product updates.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In my opinion, inconsistent and visually unappealing survey visuals (e.g., NPS and cSAT questions look completely different from each other, creating a disjointed visual experience)
Poor customer service (in my experience, issue resolution can take weeks)
Lack of clarity around API & other technical capabilities requiring engineering assistance
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use Survicate for now, over 7 years, and the tool is being constantly improved. New features and products has been introduced over the years. The team listens to our feedback we sometimes share, and improve the product based on that. We really appreciate being supported by the Customer Success, all the insights and help we got from them. And even though they introduced many new features over the years, the tool still remained super easy to use, even from new employees that join our team
In general it is a very intuitive platform that does not require much training to start working with. Especially for reporting users that are focussed on the results and insights. The CSM team and support department are also very helpful in case you do run into any questions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's rare to use products that offer wide range of features, and yet are really ease to use. Over the years, the product has changed a lot, they introduced numerous new features, but the product remained really simple to use. We know it, because new employees who join our team, have no problem in starting to use Survicate on their own, without and dedicated training. The UI is really clear.
We had a lot of issues during implementation that required help from Survicate's engineers. In my experience, it took us over 4 weeks to be fully up and running due to lag times in communication.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Setup was simple. One-time installation for our website and inside the product. We used Google Tag Manager to implement Survicate. So within 2 hours, we were able to run surveys, and also all attributes and events were passed to Survicate, so that we were able to use them to trigger surveys
There are multiple solutions that offer similar things. In the end the cutural fit with the vendor made the difference. As a foundation for future collaboration this felt as the best choice and it has proven to be a great choice since. Developments in the product have proven to be fast and based on our feedback, which makes for a great partnership and experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Considering the simplicity of the need, and the cost of such solution (~600$/yr), I don't think there was very deep research for any alternatives. The main alternative was embedding a feedback tool "organically" into our site, that option was taken off the table, for strategic considerations.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We had a business need - to collect feedback on our support knowledge base content. Feedback Lite fulfills this need, with simple, easy to use, solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info